2017
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and achievement goal complexes as predictors of beneficial outcomes: Is the influence of goals reducible to reasons?

Abstract: In the present research, we proposed a systematic approach to disentangling the shared and unique variance explained by achievement goals, reasons for goal pursuit, and specific goalreason combinations (i.e., achievement goal complexes). Four studies using this approach (involving nearly 1,800 participants) led to three basic sets of findings. First, when testing goals and reasons separately, mastery(-approach) goals and autonomous reasons explained variance in beneficial experiential (interest, satisfaction, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(183 reference statements)
5
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that multicollinearity between predictors (here, between preparatory program and performance goals) does not violate Delrue et al 2016;Vansteenkiste et al 2014a;Michou et al 2016). Recently, other scholars have challenged this position, arguing that the variable includes both a goal and a reason component and would be better conceived as an achievement goal complex (Sommet and Elliot 2017; see also Senko and Tropiano 2016). We designed and conducted this set of studies before this debate; here, we conceive the variable as pertaining to reasons connected to achievement goals, and we conceive an achievement goal complex as corresponding to an interaction between this variable and the strength of the achievement goal (as in Gaudreau 2012; Gaudreau and Braaten 2016).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that multicollinearity between predictors (here, between preparatory program and performance goals) does not violate Delrue et al 2016;Vansteenkiste et al 2014a;Michou et al 2016). Recently, other scholars have challenged this position, arguing that the variable includes both a goal and a reason component and would be better conceived as an achievement goal complex (Sommet and Elliot 2017; see also Senko and Tropiano 2016). We designed and conducted this set of studies before this debate; here, we conceive the variable as pertaining to reasons connected to achievement goals, and we conceive an achievement goal complex as corresponding to an interaction between this variable and the strength of the achievement goal (as in Gaudreau 2012; Gaudreau and Braaten 2016).…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, one may question the way in which performance goals and controlled reasons were operationalized (i.e., as two separate constructs) as well as their location in the model (i.e., goals preceding reasons). Arguably, the combination between performance goals and controlled reasons forms a single, inseparable controlled performance goal complex (Sommet and Elliot 2017), which could be better assessed using single, inseparable items (e.g., Senko and Tropiano 2016). Future research may rely on this operationalization and test for a simpler model in which controlled performance goal complex mediates the relationship between selective assessment and exploitation orientation.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to achievement goal theory, an individual's motivation towards engaging in sport or physical activity depends on the types of goals they set for themselves. These goals are called achievement goals [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies examined students' motivation in school context (Ames & Archer, 1988;Ames, 1992;Dweck, 1999), however little research has focused on the link between achievement motivation and emotional self-efficacy in university students at risk for dropping out (Pedditzi & Spigno, 2012;Ucar & Semra, 2017;Fritzsche, Schlingensiepen, & Kordts-Freudinger, 2018). Some of them, in educational psychology, examined students' motivation in school context, using the Goal Theory Approach to discuss research into motivation to learn (Elliot & Hulleman, 2017;Sommet & Elliot, 2017;Jamieson & Elliot, 2018). Students' engagement in academic activities is motivated by a complex set of achievement goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%