2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12877-017-0672-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achieved systolic blood pressure in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundIt remains unclear into which level the systolic blood pressure (SBP) should be lowered in order to provide the best cardiovascular protection among older people. Hypertension guidelines recommendation on attaining SBP levels <150 mmHg in this population is currently based on experts’ opinion. To clarify this issue, we systematically reviewed and quantified available evidence on the impact of achieving different SBP levels <150 mmHg on various adverse outcomes in subjects aged ≥60 years old receiving… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 However, evidence has shown a reduction in cardiovascular mortality particularly stroke in adults over 60 years who attained systolic BP levels between 130 and 140 mm compared to those with higher levels. 47,48 Additionally, we found lower HBP control rates in the subsidized than in the contributive insurance. These differences need more exploration because patient adherence and the use of non-pharmacological interventions were not assessed in the current analysis.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…8 However, evidence has shown a reduction in cardiovascular mortality particularly stroke in adults over 60 years who attained systolic BP levels between 130 and 140 mm compared to those with higher levels. 47,48 Additionally, we found lower HBP control rates in the subsidized than in the contributive insurance. These differences need more exploration because patient adherence and the use of non-pharmacological interventions were not assessed in the current analysis.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, hypertension is a common condition in people >60 years old. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 2020, more than 74% of the older population had hypertension [ 44 ] and required blood pressure reduction and cardio-protector treatment to decrease the risk of CVD and death [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ]. Regarding hypertension prevalence and CVD risk management in our cohort 80% of Ag subjects and 73.3% of C subjects were under treatment, according to the prevalence of these disorders in the general older population, thus they represented a realistic sample group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In middle-aged adults, the risk for cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality increases with increasing BP [5]. Likewise, numerous trials in middle-aged adults [3235], and others like SHEP [36] and Syst-Eur [37], which enrolled participants 60 years and over, have shown that lowering BP with antihypertensive treatment reduces mortality and CVD risk.…”
Section: Blood Pressure and Related Outcomes: Evidence From Trials Anmentioning
confidence: 99%