2002
DOI: 10.1006/jmre.2002.2560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Achievable Accuracy of Parameter Estimation for Multidimensional NMR Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, they can be estimated without actually acquiring spectra, but purely based on a parameterized model function and the expected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This method of experiment optimization has been used in different fields (Anastasiou and Hall, 2004;Brihuega-Moreno et al, 2003;Ober et al, 2002) but only preliminary results of its use for in vivo MRS have been reported (Bolliger et al, 2012;Chong et al, 2007;Snyder and Lange, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they can be estimated without actually acquiring spectra, but purely based on a parameterized model function and the expected signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This method of experiment optimization has been used in different fields (Anastasiou and Hall, 2004;Brihuega-Moreno et al, 2003;Ober et al, 2002) but only preliminary results of its use for in vivo MRS have been reported (Bolliger et al, 2012;Chong et al, 2007;Snyder and Lange, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large MRSI datasets (64 × 64 × 256 points) were processed by DSM in <1 min on a Pentium 4 PC computer at 1.8 GHz. The spectral analysis and metabolite image formation package (12) was applied, including calculations of Cramer‐Rao minimum variance bounds (CRBs) (15) to estimate the accuracy of the spectral fitting. The root mean square (RMS) noise of the experimental data was measured after baseline correction in the spectral range between –1.8 and –3.6 ppm, approximately 2.4 ppm downfield from the NAA resonance (16, 17).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second problem has been addressed without using numerical optimization of sampling times by all of the reduced dimensionality methods mentioned above. In particular, [14] introduces the Cramér-Rao lower bound as a measure of experiment design and uses it to compare linear and nonlinear sampling for small numbers of peaks. Similarly, 2D NOESY spectra were used to extend the results of a 3D NOESY-NOESY experiment [15] by the appropriate use of 2D mixing times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%