2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetylcysteine In Diabetes (AID): A randomized study of acetylcysteine for the prevention of contrast nephropathy in diabetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of CIN in the control group ranged from 1.5% to 35.3% with an average of 16.9%. CIN was significantly more common in the NAC group in only one of the nine studies, 33 other eight studies provided no significant evidence of a risk reduction for development of CIN with NAC contrast-associated nephropathy.…”
Section: Effects Of Nac On Outcomes In Population With Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The incidence of CIN in the control group ranged from 1.5% to 35.3% with an average of 16.9%. CIN was significantly more common in the NAC group in only one of the nine studies, 33 other eight studies provided no significant evidence of a risk reduction for development of CIN with NAC contrast-associated nephropathy.…”
Section: Effects Of Nac On Outcomes In Population With Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…39. Leoncini M, Toso A, Maioli M, Tropeano F, Villani S, Bellandi F. Early high-dose 35 36 rosuvastatin for contrast-induced nephropathy prevention in acute coronary syndrome: 37 38 39 Results from the PRATO-ACS Study (Protective Effect of Rosuvastatin and 40 …”
Section: 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with our results, the TRACK-D 15 16 17 study involving almost 3,000 DM participants with mild-to-moderate CKD 18 19 20 demonstrated a significant reduction in the relative risk of CI-AKI with rosuvastatin 21 22 therapy. 40 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients stratified as high or low risk based on GFR, NAC conferred some benefit when combined with hydration, with multivariate analysis confirming age, volume of contrast, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease as significant factors for CIN development [232]. However, no benefit was observed in studies using NAC in vascular patients [233,234] nor in diabetic patients when compared with hydration alone [235]. Several recent studies have employed the use of NAC with other agents such as bicarbonate [236,237], hydration, and theophylline, with mixed results [70,151,[237][238][239][240].…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 92%