1963
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetylcholine‐sensitive cells in the cerebral cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 402 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, evidence from human studies suggests that increased cortical ACh can enhance the selectivity of perceptual processing in the extrastriate cortex during encoding in a visual working memory task (Furey et al, 1997(Furey et al, , 2000, and scopolamine has been shown to reduce encodingrelated activity in the temporal lobes (including PRh) during visual delayed matching to sample (Schon et al, 2005). Moreover, reports indicate that direct application of cholinergic agents can fine-tune the receptive fields of cortical pyramidal cells (Krnjevic and Phillis, 1963;Sillito and Kemp, 1983;Murphy and Sillito, 1991;Rasmusson, 2000), and such findings have long been suggested as evidence for a role of cortical ACh in facilitating information acquisition, perhaps by amplifying the cortical processing of sensory stimuli (Hasselmo and Bower, 1993;Everitt and Robbins, 1997;Sarter and Bruno, 1997;Weinberger, 2003;Hasselmo and McGaughy, 2004). Thus, a local effect on stimulus acquisition within PRh might explain the impairment caused by presample scopolamine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, evidence from human studies suggests that increased cortical ACh can enhance the selectivity of perceptual processing in the extrastriate cortex during encoding in a visual working memory task (Furey et al, 1997(Furey et al, , 2000, and scopolamine has been shown to reduce encodingrelated activity in the temporal lobes (including PRh) during visual delayed matching to sample (Schon et al, 2005). Moreover, reports indicate that direct application of cholinergic agents can fine-tune the receptive fields of cortical pyramidal cells (Krnjevic and Phillis, 1963;Sillito and Kemp, 1983;Murphy and Sillito, 1991;Rasmusson, 2000), and such findings have long been suggested as evidence for a role of cortical ACh in facilitating information acquisition, perhaps by amplifying the cortical processing of sensory stimuli (Hasselmo and Bower, 1993;Everitt and Robbins, 1997;Sarter and Bruno, 1997;Weinberger, 2003;Hasselmo and McGaughy, 2004). Thus, a local effect on stimulus acquisition within PRh might explain the impairment caused by presample scopolamine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actions of some of the compounds were also tested on the antidromic spikes of corticospinal neurones (Betz cells). In these instances the medullary pyramidal tracts were exposed and stimulated with bipolar needle electrodes (Phillips, 1956;Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963b …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compounds in these three groups were also tested on the antidromically evoked spikes of single Betz cells (Phillips, 1956(Phillips, , 1959Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963b). It has already been reported that, unlike the antidromic invasion of motoneurones in the spinal cord (Curtis et al, 1959), the antidromic invasion of Betz cells is not readily blocked by y-aminobutyric acid (Krnjevic & Phillis, 1963a), although enormous doses of y-aminobutyric acid may partially block invasion (Krnjevic, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is quite a remarkable correspondence considering that only 14±16% of cortical cells appear to be cholinoceptive. Krnjevic and Phillis (1963) recorded from 1367 cortical cells, including the ordinarily``silent'' cells, and found that only 14.6% of cortical neurons respond to acetylcholine. Counts of cell bodies reacting to antibodies against muscarinic receptor or acetylcholin-esterase histochemistry similarly showed that 15.6% or 14.7% of cells in cerebral cortex are cholinoceptive (Woolf, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%