1964
DOI: 10.1038/201184a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetylcholine Quanta

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1965
1965
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If as in the cat superior cervical ganglion, only 85 % of the total bound ACh is releasable (Birks & MacIntosh, 1961), a value of 57,000 molecules of ACh per quantum is obtained. These figures may be compared with the figure of 62,000 molecules which is the most that could be contained in a vesicle of 500 A diameter (Canepa, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If as in the cat superior cervical ganglion, only 85 % of the total bound ACh is releasable (Birks & MacIntosh, 1961), a value of 57,000 molecules of ACh per quantum is obtained. These figures may be compared with the figure of 62,000 molecules which is the most that could be contained in a vesicle of 500 A diameter (Canepa, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These figures may be compared with the figure of 62,000 molecules which is the most that could be contained in a vesicle of 500 A diameter (Canepa, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum number of ACh molecules that can be accommodated inside a vesicle with a 400 A inside diameter, is 45,000 (Canepa, 1964;Hubbard, 1970). Estimates of the amount of ACh required to produce a one quantum response equivalent to a m.e.p.p.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure was solved in space group P21 with two crystallographically different molecules in the asymmetric unit. From physiological considerations Canepa (1964) suggested that one of these molecular forms was incorrect, and Dunitz (1963), observing some unusual systematic absences, suggested that the crystal used was a twinned P2~/c rather than a single P2~ specimen. Taking this into account, the structure was refined from the previous photographic intensities corrected for twinning by Canepa, Pauling & Serum (1966), referred to hereafter as CPS, to a final R of 0.10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%