2004
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0308762101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetylation of p53 augments its site-specific DNA binding both in vitro and in vivo

Abstract: p53 promotes tumor suppression through its ability to function as a transcriptional factor and is activated by posttranslational modifications that include acetylation. Our earlier study demonstrated that p53 acetylation can enhance its sequence-specific DNA binding in vitro, and this notion was later confirmed in several other studies. However, a recent study has reported that in vitro acetylation of p53 fails to stimulate its DNA binding to large DNA fragments, raising an important issue that requires furthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
317
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 373 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
12
317
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, in vitro and in vivo obtained data suggested that not only phosphorylation but CTD acetylation also enhances the sequence-specific DNA binding of p53. [49][50][51] This concept was also supported by the observation that deletion of the C-terminus increases its ability to bind to DNA using similar experimental conditions. The allosteric model was subsequently challenged by Anderson et al who showed that the interactions of p53 with PAb 421 or long DNA molecules had respectively stimulatory or inhibitory effects on its ability to bind to a short RE-containing oligonucleotide.…”
Section: The P53 C-terminal Dna-binding Domainmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In fact, in vitro and in vivo obtained data suggested that not only phosphorylation but CTD acetylation also enhances the sequence-specific DNA binding of p53. [49][50][51] This concept was also supported by the observation that deletion of the C-terminus increases its ability to bind to DNA using similar experimental conditions. The allosteric model was subsequently challenged by Anderson et al who showed that the interactions of p53 with PAb 421 or long DNA molecules had respectively stimulatory or inhibitory effects on its ability to bind to a short RE-containing oligonucleotide.…”
Section: The P53 C-terminal Dna-binding Domainmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is well known that wild-type p53 is regulated by post-translational modifications as phosphorylation at Ser15 (required for its stabilization [50] and interaction with transcriptional co-activators) and acetylation at Lys320, 373 and 382 (required for both its transcriptional activity and its transcription-independent proapoptotic function [51,52]). Although it has been observed that in UV-induced mouse skin tumors mutp53 is phosphorylated at Ser15 and accumulated exclusively to the nucleus [53], up to now little is known about post-translational modifications of mutp53 in human OS cell lines or patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most common model for p21 WAF1/Cip1 repression in cancer cells is the recruitment of HDACs by Sp1/-Sp3 transcription factors in the proximal promoter region encompassing the Sp1/Sp3 binding sites, which in turn repress p21 WAF1/Cip1 transcription by deacetylating histones H3 and H4. However, a role for p53 in HDAC-associated p21 WAF1/Cip1 expression has also been reported in several human cancer cell lines (Lagger et al, 2003;Luo et al, 2004;Roy et al, 2005;Zhao et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%