1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)69160-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase activity of lactating bovine mammary fatty acid synthase.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, fat percentage and FPR significantly increased with increasing ketone body concentrations in milk. The fat percentage and FPR increase is due to the strong body fat mobilization in the period of a negative energy balance, and the utilization of BHB for fatty acid synthesis in the mammary gland (Dodds et al, 1981). SCS increased with increasing BHB and acetone concentration.…”
Section: Statistical Associations Between Acetone and Bhb With Test-day Production Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected, fat percentage and FPR significantly increased with increasing ketone body concentrations in milk. The fat percentage and FPR increase is due to the strong body fat mobilization in the period of a negative energy balance, and the utilization of BHB for fatty acid synthesis in the mammary gland (Dodds et al, 1981). SCS increased with increasing BHB and acetone concentration.…”
Section: Statistical Associations Between Acetone and Bhb With Test-day Production Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geishauser et al (1988) reported that the correlation coe cient between BBAC and MBAC were from 0.00 to 0.87. BHBA can be utilised by the mammary gland for fatty acids synthesis and converted to butyrate (Dodds et al 1981;Du eld 2000) that is why MBAC is only 10-15% of BBAC, possibly because of the ketone body's role in fat metabolism in the udder (Andersson 1984). These uctuations in MBAC in contrast to BBAC may be a reason for the difference of BSCK from MSCK1 and MSCK2 in the present study.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…We decided to investigate the possibility of using suitable substrates for some of the individual reactions and monitoring them spectrophotometrically through the consumption of NADPH as described in Dodds et al. [26] for the bovine enzyme. Therefore, acetoacetyl‐CoA was used to monitor KR, β‐hydroxybutyryl‐CoA was used to monitor the activity of DH, and crotonoyl‐CoA was used to monitor the activity of ER.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%