2023
DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetic acid enhances drought tolerance more in female than in male willows

Abstract: Drought is an important stress factor that limits plant growth and development. Female willows generally display stronger drought tolerance than males. The application of exogenous acetic acid (AA) has emerged as an efficient and eco‐friendly approach to facilitate drought tolerance in willows. However, whether AA exerts sexually different effects on willows remains undefined. In this study, we comprehensively performed morphological and physiological analyses on three willow species, Salix rehderiana, Salix b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 85 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In further Salix species, however, female bias was also present in almost all populations but varied along biotic or abiotic environmental gradients (Bürli et al, 2022;Dawson & Bliss, 1989;Dudley, 2006;Elmqvist et al, 1988). In many female-biased Salix species, sexes differ in stress tolerance (e.g., Dawson & Bliss, 1989;Xia et al, 2023) and pathogen damage (e.g., Alliende, 1989;Boecklen et al, 1990;Moritz et al, 2016). It is unclear though, whether these differences contribute to female bias or, alternatively, are a consequence of physiological differences between sexes.…”
Section: Males and Females Are Ecologically And Morphologically Similarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In further Salix species, however, female bias was also present in almost all populations but varied along biotic or abiotic environmental gradients (Bürli et al, 2022;Dawson & Bliss, 1989;Dudley, 2006;Elmqvist et al, 1988). In many female-biased Salix species, sexes differ in stress tolerance (e.g., Dawson & Bliss, 1989;Xia et al, 2023) and pathogen damage (e.g., Alliende, 1989;Boecklen et al, 1990;Moritz et al, 2016). It is unclear though, whether these differences contribute to female bias or, alternatively, are a consequence of physiological differences between sexes.…”
Section: Males and Females Are Ecologically And Morphologically Similarmentioning
confidence: 99%