Acetamidinium-substituted methylammonium lead iodide based perovskite solar cell on flexible stainless-steel substrate

Kumar, Sandeep; Palariya, Anuj Kumar; Mohapatra, Aiswarya Abhisek; Patil, Satish; Avasthi, Sushobhan

doi:10.1109/pvsc43889.2021.9518654

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It is of interest to compare the PCE of 16.5% for the p–i–n substrate-configuration cell to the PCE of 14.9% recently reported for n–i–p substrate-configuration cells on the same quality planarized steel . The n–i–p substrate cells use identical Ti/ITO bottom and ITO/MgF 2 top electrodes but differ in the charge-selective contact layers.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 55%

“…It is of interest to compare the PCE of 16.5% for the p−i−n substrate-configuration cell to the PCE of 14.9% recently reported for n−i−p substrate-configuration cells on the same quality planarized steel. 19 The n−i−p substrate cells use identical Ti/ITO bottom and ITO/MgF 2 top electrodes but differ in the charge-selective contact layers. A nanoparticle SnO 2 layer covered with a PCBA ( [6,6]-phenyl-C 61 -butyric acid) monolayer serves as the ETL, while the HTL is composed of a thin thermally evaporated layer of TCTA (tris(4-carbazoyl-9-ylphenyl)amine) (10 nm) covered with MoO 3 (15 nm).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… 4 − 20 Substrate-configurations have also been designed for perovskite photovoltaic metal fibers. 21 − 23 The highest reported efficiencies for PSCs on metal substrates range from 14.7 to 15.2% for substrate-configuration PSCs on metal substrates 12 , 13 , 19 and are less than for superstrate-configuration architectures, where the PSC is built on and illuminated through a transparent glass substrate. Superstrate-configuration PSCs recently reached a record PCE of 25.7%.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When PSCs are fabricated on a metal foil or rigid substrate, a so-called substrate configuration is required in which the cell is illuminated via a transparent top electrode, similar to semi-transparent solar cells . Achieving high power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) has been challenging for substrate-configuration PSCs deposited on metal substrates. − Substrate-configurations have also been designed for perovskite photovoltaic metal fibers. − The highest reported efficiencies for PSCs on metal substrates range from 14.7 to 15.2% for substrate-configuration PSCs on metal substrates ,, and are less than for superstrate-configuration architectures, where the PSC is built on and illuminated through a transparent glass substrate. Superstrate-configuration PSCs recently reached a record PCE of 25.7% .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

p–i–n Perovskite Solar Cells on Steel Substrates

Feleki

Bouwer

Zardetto

et al. 2022

ACS Appl. Energy Mater.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An efficient substrate-configuration p–i–n metal-halide perovskite solar cell (PSC) is fabricated on a polymer-coated steel substrate. The optimized cell employs a Ti bottom electrode coated with a thin indium tin oxide (ITO) interlayer covered with a self-assembled [2-(9 H -carbazol-9-yl)ethyl]phosphonic acid monolayer as a hole-selective contact. A triple-cation perovskite is used as the absorber layer. Thermally evaporated C 60 and atomic layer deposited SnO 2 layers serve to create an electron-selective contact. The cells use an ITO top electrode with an antireflective MgF 2 coating. The optimized cell fabricated on a polymer-coated steel substrate reaches a power conversion efficiency of 16.5%, which approaches the 18.4% efficiency of a p–i–n reference superstrate-configuration cell that uses a similar stack design. Optical simulations suggest that the remaining optical losses are due to the absorption of light by the ITO top electrode, the C 60 layer, the Ti bottom electrode, and reflection from the MgF 2 coating in almost equal amounts. The major loss is, however, in the fill factor as a result of an increased sheet resistance of the top ITO electrode.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 55%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

p–i–n Perovskite Solar Cells on Steel Substrates

Feleki

Bouwer

Zardetto

et al. 2022

ACS Appl. Energy Mater.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Notably, perovskite technology currently has the highest known efficiency in the solar cell realm (26.1%) [26]. PSCs have been effectively applied to steel substrates with a reported efficiency of 16.5% [27][28][29][30]. While previous studies have focused on the fabrication of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) on rigid SS substrates to achieve high efficiency, this paper distinguishes itself by successfully extending the fabrication of these cells to flexible substrates.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perovskite Solar Cell on Stainless Steel Substrate over 10% Efficiency for Building-Integrated Photovoltaics

Lee,

Bae

et al. 2023

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the integration of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) on stainless steel (SS) substrates for application in building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV). Using advanced atomic force microscopy measurements, we confirmed that enhanced substrate roughness increased the reflectance along an interface. Consequently, a remarkable final efficiency of 11.9% was achieved. Notably, PSCs, known for their exceptional efficiency of 26.1%, can overcome the inherent efficiency limitations of SS-based thin-film solar cells. In this study, a PSC with an efficiency of 14% was fabricated on a flexible SS substrate. This study is a significant step towards advancing sustainable energy solutions for BIPV applications. The global shift towards renewable energy sources has catalyzed intensive research and development efforts, rendering the exploration of alternative materials and manufacturing processes a priority. The success of PSCs on SS substrates underscores their promise to achieve a balance between efficiency and versatility in BIPV solutions. Moreover, our findings reveal that controlling the substrate surface characteristics can significantly enhance the performance of PSCs, offering a pathway toward greater energy efficiency and sustainability in the construction industry.

show abstract

Progress, challenges, and perspectives on polymer substrates for emerging flexible solar cells: A holistic panoramic review

Subudhi

Punetha

2023

Progress in Photovoltaics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In pursuit of a renewable, inexpensive, sustainable, and compact energy source to replace fossil fuels, solar photovoltaic devices have become an ideal alternative to meet human needs for environmentally friendly, affordable, and portable power sources. It is due to their excellent mechanical robustness and outstanding energy conversion efficiency. Concerning the increasing demand for flexible and wearable electronic devices with standalone power sources, much attention has been paid to photovoltaics' flexibility and lightweight developments. Along with high mechanical flexibility and lightweight, flexible photovoltaic devices have the advantages of conformability, bendability, wearability, moldability, and roll‐to‐roll processing into complex shapes that can produce niche products. Emerging solar cells, among other photovoltaic technologies, have been exalted for their high conversion efficiency, low cost, and ease of production, making them a viable new‐generation photovoltaic technology. The main commercialization choice for cutting‐edge solar cells is flexible dye‐sensitized and perovskite solar cells since they can be made using a roll‐to‐roll printing technique and are appropriate for mass manufacturing. More significantly, flexible evolving solar cells may be created on ultrathin and light substrates to fulfill the demands of the developing flexible electronics industry and discover uses that are not possible with traditional photovoltaic technology. In any flexible device, the substrate is a backbone on which further materials rely. A flexible substrate reduces the installation and transportation charges, thereby reducing the system price and increasing power conversion efficiency. In this review, we comprehensively assess relevant materials suitable for making flexible photovoltaic devices. Several flexible substrate materials, including ultra‐thin glass, metal foils, and various types of polymer materials, have been considered. For conducting materials, transparent conducting oxides, metal nanowires/grids, carbon nanomaterials, and conducting polymers have also been comprehended. Progress on various flexible foils, fabrication and stability issues, current challenges, and solutions to those challenges of using conductive polymer substrate is endorsed and reviewed in detail. The originality of this holistic study lies in its ability to offer a thorough overview of recent advancements in flexible dye‐sensitized and perovskite solar cells on polymer substrates, which is conceivable and worthy as a roadmap for future research work.

show abstract

Acetamidinium-substituted methylammonium lead iodide based perovskite solar cell on flexible stainless-steel substrate

Cited by 5 publications

References 13 publications

p–i–n Perovskite Solar Cells on Steel Substrates

p–i–n Perovskite Solar Cells on Steel Substrates

Perovskite Solar Cell on Stainless Steel Substrate over 10% Efficiency for Building-Integrated Photovoltaics

Progress, challenges, and perspectives on polymer substrates for emerging flexible solar cells: A holistic panoramic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About