2013
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.95b2.30548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acetabular fractures with marginal impaction

Abstract: Purpose: clinical and radiological evaluation of the results of the technique of elevation and grafting of osteochondral marginal impaction fragment of posterior wall acetabular fractures and complications assessment in follow up period 1-3 years. Methods: Twenty patients were available for this study had fracture acetabulum with marginal impaction fragment. Elevation, reduction and bone graft impaction of the defect was the technique in all cases. Follow up was 1-3 years. Evaluation of patient was done clinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
31
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This term was first used in reference to posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. It is described as “a rotated, impacted single or multi-fragmented fracture with depression of the osteochondral fragments into the underlying cancellous bone.” 11,21 Mc Connell and Tornetta adapted this to describe plafond impaction in Supination-Adduction type fractures of the ankle, but it has never been described in direct association with posterior malleolus fractures. 25 There is limited data on the best modality to identify marginal impaction, but computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This term was first used in reference to posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. It is described as “a rotated, impacted single or multi-fragmented fracture with depression of the osteochondral fragments into the underlying cancellous bone.” 11,21 Mc Connell and Tornetta adapted this to describe plafond impaction in Supination-Adduction type fractures of the ankle, but it has never been described in direct association with posterior malleolus fractures. 25 There is limited data on the best modality to identify marginal impaction, but computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marginal impaction of the acetabulum, occurring as a result of force transmission through the femoral head is a poor prognostic marker associated with posterior wall fractures. Following operative fixation, 25% of patients with this specific fracture pattern, have a poor mid-term result 11. There was evidence of marginal impaction in two of the four fractures in this series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…La impactación marginal se reporta en alrededor del 30% de los pacientes. 17,18 Para el tratamiento de esa lesión en particular se plantea rellenar la cavidad con el fin de recuperar la relación de la cabeza femoral dentro del acetábulo. Para ello, se debe primero identificar la impactación, luego levantar el fragmento y rotarlo a su posición natural.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified