Journal of Experimental Pathology 2020
DOI: 10.33696/pathology.1.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prosthetic Breast Reconstructive Surgery with Prepectoral Technique: A Literature Review

Abstract: BR after surgery for cancer has indeed become crucial for patients' satisfaction and quality of life. Delayed breast reconstruction using tissue expanders has demonstrated to cause dissatisfaction towards body image and emotional and social distress [6]. Lately, thanks to the spread of devices to assess blood flow intraoperatively, of medical devices like synthetic and biological meshes (Acellular Dermal Matrices: ADMs) providing complete covering of implants [7-9], surgical techniques such as skin-sparing (SS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction continues to gain traction among both patients and surgeons. 6 In a recent survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 75.70% of respondents reported having performed prepectoral reconstruction in their practice. 7 Prepectoral prosthetic placement in an appropriate candidate can reduce postoperative pain, eliminate animation deformity, and mitigate functional discomfort in comparison with subpectoral reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction continues to gain traction among both patients and surgeons. 6 In a recent survey of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 75.70% of respondents reported having performed prepectoral reconstruction in their practice. 7 Prepectoral prosthetic placement in an appropriate candidate can reduce postoperative pain, eliminate animation deformity, and mitigate functional discomfort in comparison with subpectoral reconstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%