Aceh Free Pasung: Releasing the mentally ill from physical restraint

Abstract

BackgroundPhysical restraint and confinement of the mentally ill (called pasung in Indonesia) is common in Aceh. In early 2010, the local government initiated a program called Aceh Free Pasung 2010. The main goal of the program is to release the mentally ill in the province from restraint and to provide appropriate medical treatment and care. The aim of the paper is to report the findings of a preliminary investigation of the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who have been admitted to the Banda Aceh Mental Hospital as part of the Aceh Free Pasung program.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted at the Banda Aceh Mental Hospital, where people who had been restrained or confined in the community are being admitted for psychiatric treatment and, where necessary, physical rehabilitation, as part of the Aceh Free Pasung program.ResultsFifty-nine of former ex-pasung patients were examined. The majority (88.1%) of the patients were male, aged 18 to 68 years. The duration of pasung varied from a few days to 20 years, with a mean duration of 4.0 years. The reasons for applying pasung are many, with concerns about dangerousness being most common. The great majority (89.8%) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia.DiscussionThe development of a community mental health system and the introduction of a health insurance system in Aceh (together with the national health insurance scheme for the poor) has enabled access to free hospital treatment for people with severe mental disorders, including those who have been in pasung. The demographic and clinical characteristics of this group of ex-pasung patients are broadly similar to those reported in previous studies.ConclusionsThe Aceh Free Pasung program is an important mental health and human rights initiative that can serve to inform similar efforts in other parts of Indonesia and other low and middle-income countries where restraint and confinement of the mentally ill is receiving insufficient attention.

Use of physical restraints among patients with bipolar disorder in Ethiopian Mental Specialized Hospital, outpatient department: cross-sectional study

“…Those patients who had history of aggression were two times more likely to managed with restrained as compared with those do not have aggressive behavior with odds of [AOR = 2.14, 95% CI (1.26, 3.63)], which coincide with Indonesia (Puteh et al 2011) and Iran (Hadi et al 2015). This may be due to the relation between being aggressive and the management by physical restrained for this behavior in the community and mental health care setting.…”

“…Many restrained psychiatric patients had developed muscular atrophy due to their restraint and all required physical therapies during their hospitalization (Puteh et al 2011). Even though seclusion and restraint practice are used to control dangerous behavior (Needham et al 2004), an Italian study showed that absence of seclusion and restraint practice resulted low violence in psychiatric wards (Raja and Azzoni 2005).…”

Promoting Mental Health and Resilience after a Disaster

“…A disaster or other humanitarian emergency has been seen as an opportunity to introduce community mental healthcare programs for underserved populations in resource-poor countries. 9,10 It can be seen, in addition, as an opportunity to introduce mental health centrally and explicitly into the public health and social service framework of an affected community. Until now this is rare in any country, in part because the relationship between mental health and mental illness, and the scope of public mental health in any context, remain unclear in public and professional minds.…”

Comprehensive SDG goal and targets for non-communicable diseases and mental health

“…The health [17], disability [18], human rights [19], human security [20] and economic [21] arguments for inclusion of explicit mental health targets in the SDGs are compelling [22-25]. The proposals of the UN Open Working Group [26] reflect this as a result of persistent efforts and discussions by member states, the UN system, NGOs and academia, and include mental health and well-being as well as substance abuse in the draft targets.…”