1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)88695-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ACE inhibition: Postsynaptic adrenergic sympatholytic action in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The D\D genotype group had a higher incidence of ACE inhibitor use than the other groups, but since these drugs improve endothelial function [ [39][40][41][42] and reduce sympathetic activity [43,44], the differences in their use between the genotypes should have had an opposite effect to that revealed by our results. Moreover, adding the use of ACE inhibitors to the multivariate regression analysis did not abolish the difference in FMD between the genotype groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The D\D genotype group had a higher incidence of ACE inhibitor use than the other groups, but since these drugs improve endothelial function [ [39][40][41][42] and reduce sympathetic activity [43,44], the differences in their use between the genotypes should have had an opposite effect to that revealed by our results. Moreover, adding the use of ACE inhibitors to the multivariate regression analysis did not abolish the difference in FMD between the genotype groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…An enhanced reduction in forearm blood flow in response to both lower body negative pressure (a maneuver that unloads the baroreflex and stimulates sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction) and to exogenous infusion of norepinephrine has been observed with losartan in comparison with placebo [26]. In contrast, the same investigators previously demonstrated that forearm blood flow reductions in response to lower body negative pressure were attenuated with perindoprilat as compared with placebo [27]. The mechanisms that underly these differences in response are uncertain, but have been speculated to include the action of angiotensin II on receptors other than the AT 1 receptor [26].…”
Section: Studies In Humansmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…in studies with pithed normotensive rats, De Jonge et al 6 showed that the hypertensive response induced by electrical stimulation of the sympathetic vasomotor nerves was blunted by captopril, suggesting that postjunctional α 1 R are involved in the facilitative action of Ang ii on the SNS. 33 lang et al 9 demonstrated that the α 1 R-blocker prazosin blunted the antinatriuretic effects of Ang ii in the kidneys of human volunteers. Moreover, a recent study by Abdulla et al 31 investigated the impact of chronic blockade of α 1 R and At 1 R on renal hemodynamics in normal and hypertensive rats.…”
Section: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence For The α 1 Receptors And mentioning
confidence: 99%