2013
DOI: 10.4236/jsip.2013.41005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Tools for Analyzing the Behavior of Impulse Noise Reduction Filters in Color Images

Abstract: Effective cancellation of noise and preservation of color/structural information are features of paramount importance for any filter devoted to impulse noise removal in color images. In this paper novel full-reference tools for analyzing the behavior of this family of filters are presented. The proposed approach is based on the classification of color errors into two main classes that separately take into account the inaccuracy in removing noise pulses and the filtering distortion. The distortion errors are th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this first experiment we briefly highlight the advantages of our method over the classical MSE and MAE evaluations (an in-depth analysis of the inaccuracy of MAE and MSE is reported in [21]. We generated two images having very different combinations of residual noise and edge preservation, as in [21]. We adopted vector median filters having different window sizes to produce these results.…”
Section: Results Of Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this first experiment we briefly highlight the advantages of our method over the classical MSE and MAE evaluations (an in-depth analysis of the inaccuracy of MAE and MSE is reported in [21]. We generated two images having very different combinations of residual noise and edge preservation, as in [21]. We adopted vector median filters having different window sizes to produce these results.…”
Section: Results Of Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have limited accuracy in estimating the different filtering features. As already observed for grayscale [20] and color images [21], MSE and MAE cannot accurately measure noise removal and detail preservation, because they cannot separate these features. Although the MAE is more sensitive to distortion than the MSE, it also depends upon the residual noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%