2023
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj6367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate prediction of HLA class II antigen presentation across all loci using tailored data acquisition and refined machine learning

Jonas B. Nilsson,
Saghar Kaabinejadian,
Hooman Yari
et al.

Abstract: Accurate prediction of antigen presentation by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II molecules is crucial for rational development of immunotherapies and vaccines targeting CD4 + T cell activation. So far, most prediction methods for HLA class II antigen presentation have focused on HLA-DR because of limited availability of immunopeptidomics data for HLA-DQ and HLA-DP while not taking into account alternative peptide binding modes. We present an update to the NetMHCIIpan prediction met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(130 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The motif most closely matched the patients HLA-DRB1*03:01 allotype with peptide AYKMDMSLDDIIKLN predicted as a weakly binding peptide [30]. We identified 1135 missense mutations for patient A147 (Table S1) potentially yielding 6 neoantigens, representing 0.5% missense derived neoantigens, of which we observed one.…”
Section: The Lung Cancer Peptidome Resembles the Healthy Lung Tissue ...supporting
confidence: 55%
“…The motif most closely matched the patients HLA-DRB1*03:01 allotype with peptide AYKMDMSLDDIIKLN predicted as a weakly binding peptide [30]. We identified 1135 missense mutations for patient A147 (Table S1) potentially yielding 6 neoantigens, representing 0.5% missense derived neoantigens, of which we observed one.…”
Section: The Lung Cancer Peptidome Resembles the Healthy Lung Tissue ...supporting
confidence: 55%
“…An alternative approach to infer motifs is to use the pan-allele predictors, perform predictions for a large set of random peptides (at least 100 000 peptides), select the best scoring peptides (typically the top 1% best scoring peptides), and build the motif based on the predicted binding cores of these peptides. Such an approach is feasible with MixMHC2pred and NetMHCIIpan ( 21 ) in any species. Other MHC-II ligand predictors accommodating alleles without experimental ligands do not output the predicted binding cores and can moreover only be used for HLA-DR ( 25 ) or human/mouse ( 26 ) alleles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in MHC-II peptidomics have made it possible to obtain thousands of MHC-II ligands per sample in a single experiment in a high-throughput manner ( 6–18 ). Together with the development of powerful motif deconvolution algorithms to assign peptides to their cognate MHC-II alleles and identify peptide binding cores ( 12, 19 ), these data have enabled us and others to characterize the binding specificity of close to 100 alleles ( 6, 18, 20, 21 ). As of today, most of the common MHC-II alleles in human have well defined experimental motifs, but the coverage of experimental binding specificities falls short of the full diversity of human alleles (>10’000 alleles, as of November 2023 in IPD-IMGT/HLA database ( 1 )).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rules of antigen processing and presentation (APP) have been studied, assessed, and incorporated into prediction algorithms to predict T-cell epitopes 53,54 . For instance, MHCflurry 55,56 and NetMHCpan [57][58][59] are two widely used algorithms that merge scores derived from APP properties. MHCflurry encompasses two essential predictors: an "antigen processing" predictor, which models MHC allele-independent effects like proteosomal cleavage, and a "presentation" predictor that combines processing predictions with HLA-peptide binding affinity (BA) predictions to yield a composite "presentation score (PS)".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%