2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate MR Image Registration to Anatomical Reference Space for Diffuse Glioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The within-subject difference in deep GM volume was calculated by subtracting the baseline and the 1-year follow-up volume. In every subject the deep GM organs included in the PTV were censored from analysis, to avoid spurious volume-dose relations originating from segmentation errors due to damage around the tumour [22] . If the residual damage (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The within-subject difference in deep GM volume was calculated by subtracting the baseline and the 1-year follow-up volume. In every subject the deep GM organs included in the PTV were censored from analysis, to avoid spurious volume-dose relations originating from segmentation errors due to damage around the tumour [22] . If the residual damage (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image registration refers to the spatial alignment of the various imaging sequences into the same geometric/anatomic space (Fig 2A). 11 Tumor segmentation refers to contour delineation of the volumes of interest (3D) or ROIs (2D) (Fig 3). Manual segmentation or semiautomated and automated segmentation with superimposed manual segmentation is the criterion standard.…”
Section: Technologic Methods and Computational Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRI subject datasets were registered to the atlas using the FMRIB Software Library's FLIRT and FNIRT tools (Analysis Group, Oxford, United Kingdom) (Jenkinson and Smith, 2001;Jenkinson et al, 2002Jenkinson et al, , 2012) by a 12-parameter affine model with the correlation ratio cost function (FLIRT) and the sum-of-squared differences cost-function (FNIRT), which is accepted as sufficient for most brains (Heinen et al, 2016;Bartel et al, 2019;Visser et al, 2020). A manual adjustment was then performed for registration errors that were found (Figure 2).…”
Section: Atlas Evaluation For Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%