Accurate model-based segmentation of gynecologic brachytherapy catheter collections in MRI-images

Abstract

The gynecological cancer mortality rate, including cervical, ovarian, vaginal and vulvar cancers, is more than 20,000 annually in the US alone. In many countries, including the US, external-beam radiotherapy followed by high dose rate brachytherapy is the standard-of-care. The superior ability of MR to visualize soft tissue has led to an increase in its usage in planning and delivering brachytherapy treatment. A technical challenge associated with the use of MRI imaging for brachytherapy, in contrast to that of CT imaging, is the visualization of catheters that are used to place radiation sources into cancerous tissue. We describe here a precise, accurate method for achieving catheter segmentation and visualization. The algorithm, with the assistance of manually provided tip locations, performs segmentation using image-features, and is guided by a catheter-specific, estimated mechanical model. A final quality control step removes outliers or conflicting catheter trajectories. The mean Hausdorff error on a 54 patient, 760 catheter reference database was 1.49 mm; 51 of the outliers deviated more than two catheter widths (3.4 mm) from the gold standard, corresponding to catheter identification accuracy of 93% in a Syed-Neblett template. In a multi-user simulation experiment for evaluating RMS precision by simulating varying manually-provided superior tip positions, 3σ maximum errors were 2.44 mm. The average segmentation time for a single catheter was 3 seconds on a standard PC. The segmentation time, accuracy and precision, are promising indicators of the value of this method for clinical translation of MR-guidance in gynecologic brachytherapy and other catheter-based interventional procedures.

Appearance Constrained Semi-Automatic Segmentation from DCE-MRI is Reproducible and Feasible for Breast Cancer Radiomics: A Feasibility Study

“…Segmentation reproducibility resulting from the various methods using multiple user inputs was measured by computing the root mean square (RMS) of the coefficient of variation (% CV RMS ) and the RMS of standard deviation ( SD RMS ) in the segmentation metrics and as described in 40 , 41 . We used the % CV RMS as this measure has been shown to be a conservative measure of segmentation reproducibility in 41 . CV is a measure of relative variability and is defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean.…”

Population-based respiratory 4D motion atlas construction and its application for VR simulations of liver punctures

“…In recent works, for the risk-free training and planning of surgical needle interventions with visuo-haptic virtual reality simulators the inclusion of breathing motion models 1 is a core component. The simulation of tissue and needle deformation for puncture interventions and the modelling of virtual patient bodies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] has been an active research branch for years [9][10][11][12][13][14] and breathing motion can be rendered in a recent 4D visuo-haptic simulator ( Fig. 1) with GPU support using 4D direct volume rendering.…”

Automatic multi‐catheter detection using deeply supervised convolutional neural network in MRI‐guided HDR prostate brachytherapy

“…In traditional approaches, like blood vessels and nerves, catheters are considered as tubular tree-like structures. 21,22 These methods generally can be used in different imaging modalities including ultrasound (US), 19 CT, 20,23 and MRI. 19 Zhao et al 20 presented an automatic catheter tracking method in 3D US images by firstly applying a line filter method to enhance the contrast of the catheter against the background for regionsof-interest (ROI) selection using tubularness information, and then incorporating the Kalman filter into a catheter fitting model with the random sample consensus algorithm which was originally developed by Uher c ık et al 19 to detect the catheters within ROIs.…”

“…The approaches can be classified into two categories: (a) traditional model‐based segmentation algorithms, and (b) machine learning‐based methods. In traditional approaches, like blood vessels and nerves, catheters are considered as tubular tree‐like structures 21,22 . These methods generally can be used in different imaging modalities including ultrasound (US), 19 CT, 20,23 and MRI 19 .…”