1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.81.2404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Measurement of the Planck Constant

Abstract: Using a moving coil watt balance, electric power measured in terms of the Josephson and quantum Hall effects is compared with mechanical power measured in terms of the meter, kilogram, and second. We find the Planck constant h 6.626 068 91͑58͒ 3 10 234 J s. The quoted standard uncertainty (1 standard deviation estimate) corresponds to ͑8.7 3 10 28 ͒h. Comparing this measurement to an earlier measurement places an upper limit of 2 3 10 28 ͞yr on the drift rate of the SI unit of mass, the kilogram. [S0031-9007(9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
1
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A new measurement of Planck's constant, h, [46] means that this can now be converted to units of MeV without introducing additional errors.…”
Section: Experimental Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new measurement of Planck's constant, h, [46] means that this can now be converted to units of MeV without introducing additional errors.…”
Section: Experimental Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test masses of 1 kg are made of Au and Pt-Ir. The first result from this apparatus was published in 1998 with a relative uncertainty of 8.7 parts in 10 8 [23,24]. The experiment was then largely rebuilt to eliminate many of the previous error sources, but the base concept stayed the same.…”
Section: The Existing Watt Balance Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting question in this respect is in how far the NIST 1998 result [23] can be seen as independent from the later results, because the apparatus had been considerably modified. However, its uncertainty of 8.7 parts in 10 8 is too large to fulfil the first condition.…”
Section: Status Of the Redefinition Of The Kilogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of the quantum Hall effect with the Josephson effect (which allows an representation of the electrical voltage in units of h/e) leads to the possibility, to compare electrical power (which depends on the Planck constant h) with mechanical power (which depends on the mass m). The best value for the Planck constant is obtained using such a Watt balance [26]. Alternatively, one may fix the Planck constant (like the fixed value for the velocity of light for the definition of the unit of length) in order to have a new realization of the unit of mass.…”
Section: Quantum Hall Effect and Metrologymentioning
confidence: 99%