2017
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Measurement of Indoor Radon Concentration using a Low-Effective Volume Radon Monitor

Abstract: AlphaGUARD is a low-effective volume detector and one of the most popular portable radon monitors which is currently available. This study investigated whether AlphaGUARD can accurately measure the variable indoor radon levels. The consistency of the radon-concentration data obtained by AlphaGUARD is evaluated against simultaneous measurements by two other monitors (each ~10 times more sensitive than AlphaGUARD). When accurately measuring radon concentration with AlphaGUARD, we found that the net counts of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, when averaged over larger sampling times, as Carmona and Kearfott (2019) did, the AlphaGUARD measurements smooth out and follow closely with results from other devices. A similar phenomenon was observed by Tanaka et al (2017), who compared AlphaGUARD with more sensitive and accurate monitoring devices under different steady-state conditions. Though the effect is thus unlikely due to actual changes in radon level, the exact cause, whether due to noise or sensitivity drift, requires further investigation, the result of which may challenge the "gold standard" assumption.…”
Section: Calibration and Steady-state Conditionssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…That said, when averaged over larger sampling times, as Carmona and Kearfott (2019) did, the AlphaGUARD measurements smooth out and follow closely with results from other devices. A similar phenomenon was observed by Tanaka et al (2017), who compared AlphaGUARD with more sensitive and accurate monitoring devices under different steady-state conditions. Though the effect is thus unlikely due to actual changes in radon level, the exact cause, whether due to noise or sensitivity drift, requires further investigation, the result of which may challenge the "gold standard" assumption.…”
Section: Calibration and Steady-state Conditionssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…To further investigate the high radon concentrations measured in some of the locations in two storage facilities-CRSP 1 and WRSP 3-continuous radon monitoring was conducted using AlphaGUARD (P0002451, Saphymo GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), a real-time dosimeter. The AlphaGUARD is a well established portable device for radon measurement with an effective volume of 0.56 L and works in the pump mode or the diffusion mode through a large surface glass-fiber filter (Tanaka et al 2017). In addition to radon concentration levels, AlphaGUARD also provides data on the temperature, pressure, and humidity in the assessed locations that may impact the radon concentration.…”
Section: Real-time Radon Measurement In Underground Storage Facilitie...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, maximum permissible indoor radon concentrations of 100 Bq/m 3 , 150 Bq/m 3, and 200-300 Bq/m 3 are recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA), and International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), respectively (World Health Organization, 2009;International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2010). A considerable number of studies were conducted in different countries in the world including Bangladesh to measure the indoor and soil gas radon concentration via various techniques because of the health hazard following exposure (Ali et al, 2015;Sedighian et al, 2015;Tanaka et al, 2017;Sherafat et al, 2019). Concerning earlier studies in Bangladesh, Asaduzzamam et al (2015) measured radon in different building materials collected from in and around Dhaka city using gamma spectrometry (Asaduzzaman (Miah et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%