1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00873538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate masses and radii of normal stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
631
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 665 publications
(658 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
25
631
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Raising Z to 0.02 would increase M 1 and M 1 by 4 per cent, so uncertainties of ±0.1 M are appropriate. The value of 2.05 M for M 2 is fully in accordance with Andersen (1991), whose plot of mass against (B − V ) suggests that an A3 dwarf such as 12 Com B is likely to have a mass in the range 1.9-2.3 M . By substituting the values for M 1 and M 2 in the orbit solution (Table 5) …”
Section: Masses Of the Component Starssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Raising Z to 0.02 would increase M 1 and M 1 by 4 per cent, so uncertainties of ±0.1 M are appropriate. The value of 2.05 M for M 2 is fully in accordance with Andersen (1991), whose plot of mass against (B − V ) suggests that an A3 dwarf such as 12 Com B is likely to have a mass in the range 1.9-2.3 M . By substituting the values for M 1 and M 2 in the orbit solution (Table 5) …”
Section: Masses Of the Component Starssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…If the metallicity is known, and if the surface brightness of each component is well determined (through spectroscopic or photometric estimate of effective temperature), tests of evolutionary models of single stars can be made, provided the components are sufficiently far apart ("detached" systems). Such tests have been discussed by, e.g., Andersen (1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such M-dwarf eclipsing binaries are straightforward to detect from MEarth data, and it should be possible to characterise them extremely well due to their brightness, allowing model-independent mass and radius estimates with uncertainties of only a few percent to be made (e.g. Andersen 1991). …”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%