2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.99.045124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate magneto-optical determination of radius of topological nodal-ring semimetals

Abstract: Accurate magneto-optical determination of radius of topological nodal-ring Accurate magneto-optical determination of radius of topological nodal-ring semimetals semimetals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(80 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that a low-energy mode with a very similar behavior in magnetic field (constant energy position and strength increasing with B) was observed, but remained unexplained, in another gapped NLSM, NbAs 2 [19]. It would be tempting to assign both modes to the B-independent resonance, recently theoretically proposed to be a hallmark of the NLSM state [27]. However, the model used in this reference (a single nodal loop formed by crossing cones) is far too simple and not directly applicable to ZrSiS or NbAs 2 : both compounds possess complex and extended nodal lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…We note that a low-energy mode with a very similar behavior in magnetic field (constant energy position and strength increasing with B) was observed, but remained unexplained, in another gapped NLSM, NbAs 2 [19]. It would be tempting to assign both modes to the B-independent resonance, recently theoretically proposed to be a hallmark of the NLSM state [27]. However, the model used in this reference (a single nodal loop formed by crossing cones) is far too simple and not directly applicable to ZrSiS or NbAs 2 : both compounds possess complex and extended nodal lines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…2, we carefully label each LL transition, and observe that, the selection rules are n → n in the longitudinal conductivity Re(σ xx ), and n → n ± 2 in the transverse conductivity Re(σ zz ). The former selection rules are the same as the previous magneto-optic studies of E B [19,[28][29][30][31]; whereas the latter ones are distinctively different from the previous studies of E ⊥ B with conventional selection rules given as n → n ± 1 [10,16,19,[26][27][28][29][30]32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…where V is the volume of the system, f (x) is the Fermi-Dirac distribution function, J α = −ie[r α , H] is the current density operator, α = x, z is the oscillating direction of the electric field E, and 1 τ denotes the linewidth broadening induced by the impurity scattering [26,27]. We choose the Fermi energy at zero energy and set the temperature to be zero, so the index s = −1 and s = 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To realistically deal with the impurity scatterings, one would apply the self-consistent Born approximation, as it can calculate the impurity-induced self-energy in an effective way [39][40][41][42]. Because the imaginary part of the self-energy will broaden the spectral densities, here we try to phenomenologically capture the effect of the self-energy by considering a finite linewidth Γ [21,[43][44][45] in the DOS and optical conductivity [Eqs. (4) and ( 5)].…”
Section: Finite Linewidth γmentioning
confidence: 99%