2013
DOI: 10.1021/pr401017h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Label-Free Protein Quantitation with High- and Low-Resolution Mass Spectrometers

Abstract: Label-free quantitation of proteins analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry uses either integrated peak intensity from the parent-ion mass analysis (MS1) or features from fragment-ion analysis (MS2), such as spectral counts or summed fragment-ion intensity. We directly compared MS1 and MS2 quantitation by analyzing human protein standards diluted into Escherichia coli extracts on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. We found that summed MS2 intensities were nearly as accurate as integrated MS1 intensities, and both out… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
139
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afterward, the intensities of the three (or fewer) peptides with the highest intensities were averaged for every protein detected. Next, a normalized abundance factor (rTop3) was calculated by dividing the Top3 value by the sum of all Top3 values of the quantified proteins in each experiment (65), excluding contaminants. Additionally, the proteins were ranked according to their maximal rTop3 value, as calculated across each host-plant specific sample.…”
Section: Establishment Of T Urticae Lines On Different Host Plants-tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Afterward, the intensities of the three (or fewer) peptides with the highest intensities were averaged for every protein detected. Next, a normalized abundance factor (rTop3) was calculated by dividing the Top3 value by the sum of all Top3 values of the quantified proteins in each experiment (65), excluding contaminants. Additionally, the proteins were ranked according to their maximal rTop3 value, as calculated across each host-plant specific sample.…”
Section: Establishment Of T Urticae Lines On Different Host Plants-tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently we used the normalized (relative) abundance factor rTop3, based on MS1 intensity, for abundance ranking of these putative salivary proteins. This rTop3 value has been shown to correlate with the mole fraction of the protein of interest (65,90). Proteins with a high rTop3 factor are therefore assumed to be more prominent in T. urticae saliva.…”
Section: T Urticae Secretes Proteins In Artificial Diet Which Canmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(J-L) Linear regressions between relative protein amounts based on 2D-PAGE analysis of E. coli proteins 42 and the absolute proteins amounts derived from dNSAF cLL and dNIAF cLL values (Table S3B) measured in the LTQ (J), Velos (K) and Orbitrap (L) datasets. 39 We next assessed the agreement between the protein amounts quantified by dNSAF cLL , dNAAF cLL and dNIAF cLL and previously reported literature values. Out of the 1061 S. cerevisiae proteins we absolutely quantified, the abundance of 895 of these had also been measured by quantitative Western blotting of TAP-tagged proteins, 40 while the abundance of 12 of these proteins had been reported by Single Reaction Monitoring (SRM) 41 as well as quantitative Western blotting 40 (Table S3A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Knowing that 31.3µg of E. coli extract were present in each sample 39 and summing up the absolute amount we calculated from each protein, we obtained total protein recovery rates between 47% and 68% (Table S3B). Such recoveries were respectable yet lower than what we observed from the yeast analysis, most likely because the E. coli proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE and in-gel digested prior to LC-MS/MS analyses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Label free approaches are popular due to limited sample pre-processing requirements prior to analysis compared to label based methodologies. Examples include Intensity-Based Absolute Quantification (iBAQ) and Absolute Protein Expression (APEX), which have been compared for different sample types and MS platforms [16][17][18].…”
Section: Approaches In Proteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%