2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-08241-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate image super-resolution using dense connections and dimension reduction network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconstructing real ground truth images with the proposed super-resolution approach At this stage, the performance of the proposed method was compared quantitatively and qualitatively to state-of-the-art and conventional techniques, such as bicubic interpolation, FIGURE 6 Comparing the image quality of the proposed method to that of existing algorithms for a sample image of chest X-ray datasets at an x2 magnification scale dictionary-based image enhancement methods (FL [31], A+ [32]), self-similarity-based method Self-ExSR [33], and artificial neural network-based techniques (LapSRN [34], Ms-LapSRN [35], DRRN [36], FSRCNN [33], SRCNN [6], SCN [37], DRCN [38], VDSR [38], RDN [39], LapSRN [34], EDSR [40], CARN [41], MemNet [42], RCAN+ [43], SRCLIQUENET+ [44]), for magnification factors of 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, SET5, SET14, and BSDS100 databases, which contained images of natural scenes, as well as the URBAN100 dataset, which contained images of architectural challenges, were evaluated.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstructing real ground truth images with the proposed super-resolution approach At this stage, the performance of the proposed method was compared quantitatively and qualitatively to state-of-the-art and conventional techniques, such as bicubic interpolation, FIGURE 6 Comparing the image quality of the proposed method to that of existing algorithms for a sample image of chest X-ray datasets at an x2 magnification scale dictionary-based image enhancement methods (FL [31], A+ [32]), self-similarity-based method Self-ExSR [33], and artificial neural network-based techniques (LapSRN [34], Ms-LapSRN [35], DRRN [36], FSRCNN [33], SRCNN [6], SCN [37], DRCN [38], VDSR [38], RDN [39], LapSRN [34], EDSR [40], CARN [41], MemNet [42], RCAN+ [43], SRCLIQUENET+ [44]), for magnification factors of 2, 3, and 4. Furthermore, SET5, SET14, and BSDS100 databases, which contained images of natural scenes, as well as the URBAN100 dataset, which contained images of architectural challenges, were evaluated.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with many traditional SISR methods based on machine learning, the simple structure of the SRCNN model shows remarkable performance in image super-resolution problems. Then, a large number of CNN-based models were proposed to obtain more accurate SISR results using different techniques to improve the quality of the reconstructed image: the design of the network structure with residuals [18][19][20][21][22]; generative adversarial networks [23]; neural architecture search [24,25]; various attention mechanisms [26], and other technologies [27,28]. With the improvement of architecture, this field has indeed made rich progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Exposure: If position is unknown still data access is possible.  Network dimension: Depends on number of nodes [12].  Comparable network: Nodes present in a network has same characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%