2012
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate identification of human Alu and non-Alu RNA editing sites

Abstract: We developed a computational framework to robustly identify RNA editing sites using transcriptome and genome deep-sequencing data from the same individual. As compared with previous methods, our approach identified a large number of RNA editing sites with high specificity in both Alu and non-Alu regions. We also found that the editing of non-Alu sites appears to be dependent on nearby edited Alu sites, possibly through the locally formed double-stranded RNA structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

30
446
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(478 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
30
446
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such highly specific A-to-I editing events within exonic ORF sequences are the exception in the context of present understanding. Of the several thousand A-to-I-editing sites identified through next generation sequencing studies, the vast majority is found within noncoding sequences of genes that are not inducible by IFN (56,(73)(74)(75)(76)(77)(78). What then is the molecular basis of the IFN-induced, dsRNA-dependent innate responses exemplified by eIF2␣ phosphorylation and SG formation that we now find are suppressed by A-to-I editing but are de-repressed in the absence of ADAR1 following IFN treatment?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such highly specific A-to-I editing events within exonic ORF sequences are the exception in the context of present understanding. Of the several thousand A-to-I-editing sites identified through next generation sequencing studies, the vast majority is found within noncoding sequences of genes that are not inducible by IFN (56,(73)(74)(75)(76)(77)(78). What then is the molecular basis of the IFN-induced, dsRNA-dependent innate responses exemplified by eIF2␣ phosphorylation and SG formation that we now find are suppressed by A-to-I editing but are de-repressed in the absence of ADAR1 following IFN treatment?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of the former possibility, DARNED (50), a database compiling RNA editing sites from multiple publications, reports that transcripts of Spi1 (a gene encoding PU.1; chromosome 11, start: 47379732, end: 47400127) showed evidence of A-to-I RNA editing at 28 sites (14). Future geneexpression analyses and identification of de novo RNA editing sites through analysis of whole-genome and transcriptome DNA-RNA differences (15) in normal HSC harboring enforced ADAR1 p150 expression and LSC will be necessary to dissect further the link between ADAR1 activation PU.1 expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previous studies reveal extensive RNA editing in the human transcriptome (14)(15)(16)(17), primarily in primate-specific Alu sequences (18)(19)(20), which promotes splice isoform diversity. RNA editing activity is mediated by the adenosine deaminase acting on dsRNA (ADAR) family of editases (21), which includes ADAR1 (also known as ADAR), ADAR2 (ADARB1), and ADAR3 (ADARB2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A-to-I editing events occur more frequently in noncoding sequences including repetitive elements and small RNA precursors. Alu and LINE elements, when positioned as sense and antisense pairs nearby one another in the genome, exhibit the potential to form long dsRNAs, and these dsRNAs can be hyper-edited at multiple adenosines [8][9][10]. Several studies suggest that the hyper-editing in repetitive elements is involved in the regulation of gene expression [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%