The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016 International Conference for Students on Applied Engineering (ISCAE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icsae.2016.7810158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate heat loss evaluation of water-cooled electric motors using a differential ultrasonic calorimeter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 1 [17] 22 kHz 50 Hz/K 0.10 m Implementation options for the electronic driver (including PSoC1*) were discussed [18] 25 kHz 25 Hz/K 0.10 m Comparison of ultrasonic thermometer architectures was conducted [19] 46 kHz 60 Hz/K 0.10 m Use of an UOTS for overnight measurements and observed hysteresis were reported [20] 25 kHz 20 Hz/K 0.10 m Simultaneous use of two UOTSes for the same process, modular design of the electronic driver, and thermal hysteresis for the recorded data were discussed [21] 27 kHz 30 Hz/K 0.10 m Differential temperature measurement using two UOTS was reported [22] 27 kHz 30 Hz/K 0.10 m UOTS and conventional temperature sensors were compared for a posteriori detection of the temperature extremum point *PSoC1 refers to the programmable systems on chip series 1 device, which is a highly versatile electronic part manufactured by Cypress Semiconductor.…”
Section: Development Of Ultrasonic Oscillating Temperature Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fig. 1 [17] 22 kHz 50 Hz/K 0.10 m Implementation options for the electronic driver (including PSoC1*) were discussed [18] 25 kHz 25 Hz/K 0.10 m Comparison of ultrasonic thermometer architectures was conducted [19] 46 kHz 60 Hz/K 0.10 m Use of an UOTS for overnight measurements and observed hysteresis were reported [20] 25 kHz 20 Hz/K 0.10 m Simultaneous use of two UOTSes for the same process, modular design of the electronic driver, and thermal hysteresis for the recorded data were discussed [21] 27 kHz 30 Hz/K 0.10 m Differential temperature measurement using two UOTS was reported [22] 27 kHz 30 Hz/K 0.10 m UOTS and conventional temperature sensors were compared for a posteriori detection of the temperature extremum point *PSoC1 refers to the programmable systems on chip series 1 device, which is a highly versatile electronic part manufactured by Cypress Semiconductor.…”
Section: Development Of Ultrasonic Oscillating Temperature Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was solved over time by improving the piezo materials, the temperature retention techniques and temperature-compensated devices [24]. We have recently presented several sets of UOTS experimental data obtained during heating/cooling cycles, which exhibited similar hysteresis [19][20][21].…”
Section: Hysteresis In Piezoelectric Transducers and The Possibility mentioning
confidence: 99%