2015
DOI: 10.5139/ijass.2015.16.2.206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Free Vibration Analysis of Launcher Structures Using Refined 1D Models

Abstract: This work uses different finite element approaches to the free vibration analysis of reinforced shell structures, and a simplified model of a typical launcher with two boosters is used as an example. The results obtained using a refined one-dimensional (1D) beam model are compared to those obtained with commercial finite element software. The 1D models that are used in the present work are based on the Carrera Unified Formulation (CUF), which assumes a variable kinematic displacement field over the cross-secti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant breakthrough has meant that complex reinforced structures to be analysed, isotropic curved panels and reinforced cylinder, in static [26] and dynamic [27] analyses. This approach has been used to study a luncher made in isotropic material [28] with a central body and two lateral boosters. The effect of the solid fuel consumption on the dynamic behaviour of the proposed isotropic launcher has been also considered [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant breakthrough has meant that complex reinforced structures to be analysed, isotropic curved panels and reinforced cylinder, in static [26] and dynamic [27] analyses. This approach has been used to study a luncher made in isotropic material [28] with a central body and two lateral boosters. The effect of the solid fuel consumption on the dynamic behaviour of the proposed isotropic launcher has been also considered [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to FEM approximation along the y − axis, the 11 components joined together are modelled using different beam elements, in particular, 2 − B3 beam elements are used for the thin-walled reinforced components, while only 1 − B3 beam element is used to model the rib components. The cross-section geometrical properties can be found in[28] where the 1D − CU F (or LE) metallic model is compared with respect to two FE models from the commercial Nastran code, a shell − beam FE model and a Solid Ref ined model. An advanced assessment analysis was conduced recently in[29] where the metallic LE launcher model is compared with respect to a Solid FE model using the same DOFs, as shown in the first three columns of the Tab.4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrera et al 2013b, Carrera et al 2013a, Carrera et al 2014band Carrera et al 2015a proposed the static and free vibration analyses of civil buildings and wing structures. Using the CW approach, various complex space structures have been proposed by Carrera et al 2015c for the free vibration analysis of launchers. In the works of , a new approach is used to model damaged aerospace structures, by changing the local stiffness getting various damage configurations in a simple manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the component-wise (CW) approach, presented in [27], makes it possible to study very complex structures using a unique one-dimensional formulation. The effectiveness of the CW approach has been shown for both static [27,28] and dynamic [29,30,31] analyses, including the effect of a non structural mass [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%