Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the ACL - ACL '06 2006
DOI: 10.3115/1220175.1220295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate collocation extraction using a multilingual parser

Abstract: This paper focuses on the use of advanced techniques of text analysis as support for collocation extraction. A hybrid system is presented that combines statistical methods and multilingual parsing for detecting accurate collocational information from English, French, Spanish and Italian corpora. The advantage of relying on full parsing over using a traditional window method (which ignores the syntactic information) is first theoretically motivated, then empirically validated by a comparative evaluation experim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments performed made use of very small text corpora, probably due to the low efficiency of the syntactic techniques available at that time. Similar experiments were performed more recently [16,17,21]. All of them state that syntax-based methods outperform windowing techniques thanks to a drastic reduction of noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…The experiments performed made use of very small text corpora, probably due to the low efficiency of the syntactic techniques available at that time. Similar experiments were performed more recently [16,17,21]. All of them state that syntax-based methods outperform windowing techniques thanks to a drastic reduction of noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Concerning the type of context used to represent word distributions, there is a great number of previous studies that evaluate and compare syntactic contexts (usually dependencies) with bagof-words techniques (Grefenstette, 1993;Seretan and Wehrli, 2006;Padó and Lapata, 2007;Peirsman et al, 2007;Gamallo, 2008Gamallo, , 2009Levy and Goldberg, 2014;Gamallo, 2017). The cited papers state that syntax-based methods outperform bagof-words techniques, in particular when the objective is to compute semantic similarity between functional equivalent words, such as detection of co-hyponym/hypernym word relations (i.e.…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches are hybrid in the sense that they benefit from both statistical and linguistic information. For instance (Seretan and Wehrli, 2006;Baldwin and Villavicencio, 2002;Piao and McEnery, 2001;Dias, 2003).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%