2023
DOI: 10.1364/oe.495388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate calibration for crosstalk coefficient based on orthogonal color phase-shifting pattern

Abstract: The crosstalk coefficient calibration of de-crosstalk in color fringe projection profilometry is an essential step for the high-accuracy measurement. In this paper, a novel approach for calibrating crosstalk matrix of color camera is proposed. The wrapped phase error model introduced by color crosstalk in orthogonal pattern is established. Compared with the existing calibration methods depending on calculating the modulation of the crosstalk channel, the crosstalk coefficients are obtained from phase error in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In optical interferometry [1] as well as in 3D reconstruction using fringe projection profilometry (FPP) [2,3], phase retrieval is a common but fundamental step that often consists of two stages: wrapped or relative phase retrieval and phase unwrapping. While extensive efforts have been made to reduce phase errors induced via gamma nonlinear error elimination [4], color cross-talk [5], highlights [6], interreflection [7] and motion [8], which leads to improved phase accuracy, the efficiency is still unsatisfactory for real-time applications due to the projection of multiple fringe patterns with different frequencies and phase shifts [9]. For instance, during relative phase retrieval with a standard N-step phaseshifting (PS) algorithm, at least N ≥ 3 fringe patterns with different phase shifts are needed, which limits the algorithm to a relatively narrow range of applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In optical interferometry [1] as well as in 3D reconstruction using fringe projection profilometry (FPP) [2,3], phase retrieval is a common but fundamental step that often consists of two stages: wrapped or relative phase retrieval and phase unwrapping. While extensive efforts have been made to reduce phase errors induced via gamma nonlinear error elimination [4], color cross-talk [5], highlights [6], interreflection [7] and motion [8], which leads to improved phase accuracy, the efficiency is still unsatisfactory for real-time applications due to the projection of multiple fringe patterns with different frequencies and phase shifts [9]. For instance, during relative phase retrieval with a standard N-step phaseshifting (PS) algorithm, at least N ≥ 3 fringe patterns with different phase shifts are needed, which limits the algorithm to a relatively narrow range of applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%