2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2021.139099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate calculations for the Dirac electron in the field of two-center Coulomb field: Application to heavy ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without pursuing the goal of the highest numerical accuracy, we show that the A-DKB approach can be effectively used to calculate the bound-electron energies in light diatomic compounds by solving the two-center Dirac equation. The accuracy of our calculations is comparable to [12], i.e. it is at the 10 −8 level, which represents an alternative to ultraaccurate calculations, see, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Without pursuing the goal of the highest numerical accuracy, we show that the A-DKB approach can be effectively used to calculate the bound-electron energies in light diatomic compounds by solving the two-center Dirac equation. The accuracy of our calculations is comparable to [12], i.e. it is at the 10 −8 level, which represents an alternative to ultraaccurate calculations, see, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We estimated the accuracy of our values at 10 −8 by comparing them with numerical results performed within the framework of the nonrelativistic approach [37,38]. Although the A-DKB method was initially adapted to study quasi-molecules with heavy nuclei [28][29][30], the results obtained for light systems show sufficient accuracy with the data presented in the literature and are comparable to those for heavy compounds [12]. While this question is not crucial for this work, the A-DKB approach is capable of high-precision calculations using the methods described in [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation