2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate and efficient calculation of response times for groundwater flow

Abstract: We study measures of the amount of time required for transient flow in heterogeneous porous media to effectively reach steady state, also known as the response time. Here, we develop a new approach that extends the concept of mean action time. Previous applications of the theory of mean action time to estimate the response time use the first two central moments of the probability density function associated with the transition from the initial condition, at t = 0, to the steady state condition that arises in t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() used a groundwater flow model to relate spring discharge with the storage in the aquifer. Carr and Simpson () used a linearized version of the Dupuit–Forchheimer model to estimate the response time of the groundwater flow. Su et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() used a groundwater flow model to relate spring discharge with the storage in the aquifer. Carr and Simpson () used a linearized version of the Dupuit–Forchheimer model to estimate the response time of the groundwater flow. Su et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three first moments are considered here and evaluated by numerical integration of the solution of Bruggeman. Alternatively, the moments can be obtained by solving the differential equation for the moments of the response function (e.g., Bakker et al ; Carr and Simpson ).…”
Section: Results Of Standard Time Series Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three first moments are considered here and evaluated by numerical integration of the solution of Bruggeman. Alternatively, the moments can be obtained by solving the differential equation for the moments of the response function (e.g., Bakker et al 2007;Carr and Simpson 2018). The moments are recombined and expressed as the mean response time μ and the standard deviationσ of the response function (Weisstein 2018b):…”
Section: Physical Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the discrete case, provided t N is large enough (see, e.g. [20,21], for how to estimate steady state times), the integral I T appearing in the thermal diffusivity formulas, Eqs (17)- (19) and (44)-(47), can be approximated using the trapezoidal rule [11]. For example, for the homogeneous sample:…”
Section: Verification Of Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each estimate of the thermal diffusivity is compared to the target value in Table 1 by calculating the signed relative errors ε = (α − α)/α (homogeneous) and ε k = (α k − α k )/α k for k = 1, 2 (twolayer) with the tilde used to indicate the estimated value produced from the rear-surface integral method. In Table 2, results for both the homogeneous and twolayer samples are presented for the rectangular (20), triangular (21) and exponential (22) pulses with τ = 0.005 s, β = 0.001 s, Q∞ = 7000 J m −2 , N = 1000 temperature rise values, ∆t = 10 −4 s, t N = 0.1 s and n = 500 nodes. In all cases, the estimate agrees with the target values of the thermal diffusivity in Table 1 to 4-5 significant digits with a relative error of approximately 10 −4 .…”
Section: Verification Of Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%