2005
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2005.856278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate and approximate evaluations of asynchronous tunable-wavelength-converter sharing schemes in optical burst-switched networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An approximate analytical model to evaluate packet loss for the SPN scheme is given in Mingwu et al [19] for the asynchronous scenario with Poisson input but only for balanced traffic. An alternative organization of the SPN scheme to improve scalability is proposed in Chan et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approximate analytical model to evaluate packet loss for the SPN scheme is given in Mingwu et al [19] for the asynchronous scenario with Poisson input but only for balanced traffic. An alternative organization of the SPN scheme to improve scalability is proposed in Chan et al [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, a numerical CTMC (Continuous Time Markov Chain) based algorithm for PWC in asynchronous SPL architectures is first proposed in [14]. Recently, a similar CTMC-based analysis is also proposed in [15] for the SPL case with Poisson packet arrivals and exponentially distributed packet lengths, and an approximate analysis is proposed for the SPN case. Although the analysis of [15] for the SPL case is similar to that of [14], the block structure of the CTMC is not exploited and the authors report problems in large systems (e.g., K = 64) and for rare blocking probabilities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various schemes such as wavelength conversion [4], optical buffering [5], burst segmentation (BS) [6,9], and deflection routing [11] are proposed for contention resolution in the literature. Also see [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Contention Resolution In Obsmentioning
confidence: 99%