2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy, stability, and performance comparison between the spectral difference and flux reconstruction schemes

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When switching to the high-order method, the results of the URDNS approach degraded, with large oscillations observed in the variance profiles. This effect can likely be attributed to aliasing-driven instabilities evident in high-order approximations of under-resolved turbulent flows, which can introduce spurious high-frequency oscillations in the flow that are more evident in higher-order statistics [30]. When using the high-order method for the PANS approach, this effect was not seen, likely due to the suppression of aliasing errors as a result of the introduction of a physically appropriate eddy viscosity.…”
Section: Periodic Hillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When switching to the high-order method, the results of the URDNS approach degraded, with large oscillations observed in the variance profiles. This effect can likely be attributed to aliasing-driven instabilities evident in high-order approximations of under-resolved turbulent flows, which can introduce spurious high-frequency oscillations in the flow that are more evident in higher-order statistics [30]. When using the high-order method for the PANS approach, this effect was not seen, likely due to the suppression of aliasing errors as a result of the introduction of a physically appropriate eddy viscosity.…”
Section: Periodic Hillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Eqs. (34)(35)(36), P U is the transformation matrix from conservative to characteristic variables usually expressed following:…”
Section: Wave Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, in Liang et al [35], it was shown that FR is most efficient and DG is the slowest but in terms of accuracy DG is the best and FR is the worst. For both efficiency and accuracy the SD method stands in between whereas in a more recent study, Cox et al [36] stated that the SD method is more robust and accurate than FR. This is very encouraging for pursuing the development of the SD method to simulate complex flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This method has become increasingly popular over the past decade, spawning further research in discontinuous high-order schemes. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] Details on the current flow solver are provided in Cox et al [47][48][49] and Cox. 50 A grid spacing h and polynomial p convergence study was performed 12 where we found that a mesh containing a total of 69 888 hexahedral elements and a p = 4 Lagrange polynomial used to approximate the solution in each element provide ample spatial resolution (∼8.7M degrees of freedom) to converge the L 2 -norm of the error in the wall shear stress to within 0.78% and the velocity magnitude to within 0.25%.…”
Section: B Numerical Schemementioning
confidence: 99%