2020
DOI: 10.5455/jpma.302464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of working length measurement with endo motor having built-in apex locator and comparison with periapical radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electronic apical locators are very important devices in Endodontics. When compared with radiography, EAL decreases exposure to radiation and determines the position of the apical constriction or apical foramen, rather than of the radiographic apex (Bernardes et al 2021;Abidi et al 2020). Some authors, following manufacturers' instructions, and using methods similar to those adopted in this study, analyzed the accuracy of EALs in locating apical constriction, or a distance 0.5mm short of the apical foramen (Piasecki et al 2016;Connert et al 2018;Serna-Peña et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Electronic apical locators are very important devices in Endodontics. When compared with radiography, EAL decreases exposure to radiation and determines the position of the apical constriction or apical foramen, rather than of the radiographic apex (Bernardes et al 2021;Abidi et al 2020). Some authors, following manufacturers' instructions, and using methods similar to those adopted in this study, analyzed the accuracy of EALs in locating apical constriction, or a distance 0.5mm short of the apical foramen (Piasecki et al 2016;Connert et al 2018;Serna-Peña et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 16 17 18 ] The use of endodontic motors with EAL together presents the advantage of monitoring the WL during root canal preparation, and previous studies reported their suitable accuracy for WL determination[ 19 20 21 ] being that in some cases showed better accuracy than to conventional radiographic method. [ 9 21 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic measurements were compared with controls WL and according to a previous study[ 9 ] when the difference between the values was ≤0.5 mm, the measurement was considered accurate (score 0), whereas differences >0.5 mm were considered inaccurate (score 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O localizador eletrônico foraminal (LEF) é uma ferramenta utilizada já há bastante tempo para a determinação da odontometria em tratamentos endodônticos de dentes permanentes [8][9][10][11][12][13] . Na odontopediatria é um dispositivo interessante de ser utilizado, uma vez que pode reduzir o tempo clínico, além de auxiliar na identificação de reabsorções não detectáveis radiograficamente 3,13 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified