2017
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of visual cervical screening: verification bias revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it is possible that both sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection were overestimated. 15 A pooled analysis of individual data from 17 studies in China demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of VIA for CIN2+ detection were 48.0% and 90.4%, respectively, 13 which decreased reference standard misclassification by requiring several screening tests to be negative and using four-quadrant punch biopsy when no colposcopically suspect lesions were seen. A screening study in Cameroonian peri-urban areas also showed the sensitivity of VIA to be less than 36.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it is possible that both sensitivity and specificity of visual inspection were overestimated. 15 A pooled analysis of individual data from 17 studies in China demonstrated that the sensitivity and specificity of VIA for CIN2+ detection were 48.0% and 90.4%, respectively, 13 which decreased reference standard misclassification by requiring several screening tests to be negative and using four-quadrant punch biopsy when no colposcopically suspect lesions were seen. A screening study in Cameroonian peri-urban areas also showed the sensitivity of VIA to be less than 36.4%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemeriksaan dengan inspeksi visual dengan asam asetat (VIA) (Pinder et al, 2020), diikuti dengan pengobatan segera pada perempuan IVA-positif (pendekatan skrining dan pengobatan) dapat mengurangi jumlah kunjungan klinik dan secara signifikan meningkatkan kepatuhan pengobatan (Basu et al, 2018;Maza et al, 2017;WHO, 2013). Program skrining dengan IVA telah terbukti berhasil untuk mendiagnosis positif dan pengobatan lebih awal untuk lesi pra kanker (Abu et al, 2020;Wentzensen & Tamara, 2018). Oleh karena itu, implementasi IVA adalah intervensi yang menjanjikan yang akan membantu mengendalikan penyakit.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified
“…Given that few studies done this, colposcopic verification of disease status would be biased towards confirming the VIA results and therefore give inflated estimates of both sensitivity and specificity. [76] A further consideration is that VIA performance decreases in older women due to the regression of the transformation zone into the endocervix, [77] so the use of VIA needs to account for the age profile of the screening population.…”
Section: Visual Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%