2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00369.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Two Stereolithographic Surgical Templates: A Retrospective Study

Abstract: The results of the present study indicated best accuracy of the single-type guide using a bone or tooth support. The multiple-type guide recorded the best accuracy data when the mucosa support was considered comparing either a fixed and a not-fixed single-type guide.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
70
2
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
70
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The entry point and apical mean deviations as well as angle, lateral, and depth deviations obtained from this study were within the lower end of the comparison ranges. The deviations may be related to mechanical errors caused by the gap between the guiding sleeve and the bur during simulation procedures . Comparing previous results listed in Table with the data attained from this study, we conclude that computer‐aided positioning of oral implants with an HMD and a computer‐generated AR environment as well as a SLA surgical template exceeds presently available methods in accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The entry point and apical mean deviations as well as angle, lateral, and depth deviations obtained from this study were within the lower end of the comparison ranges. The deviations may be related to mechanical errors caused by the gap between the guiding sleeve and the bur during simulation procedures . Comparing previous results listed in Table with the data attained from this study, we conclude that computer‐aided positioning of oral implants with an HMD and a computer‐generated AR environment as well as a SLA surgical template exceeds presently available methods in accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…3,5,6,[10][11][12][13] With CT, bone density measurements are given in HU based on density values for air (-1,000 HU) and pure water (0 HU). 3,5,6,[10][11][12][13] With CT, bone density measurements are given in HU based on density values for air (-1,000 HU) and pure water (0 HU).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Cbct-and Ct-based Gray Density Valumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Several studies have proposed a variety of methods for assessing bone density, but these involve evaluation either at the time of implant site preparation or subsequent to implant placement. 3,5,6 Even more recently, due to the need for less expensive image acquisition protocols or for scanners with lower radiation dose, cone beam CT (CBCT) has been widely employed for oral and maxillofacial imaging, 7 as it seems to provide good spatial resolution, gray density range, and contrast, as well as a good pixel/noise ratio. 3,5,6 Even more recently, due to the need for less expensive image acquisition protocols or for scanners with lower radiation dose, cone beam CT (CBCT) has been widely employed for oral and maxillofacial imaging, 7 as it seems to provide good spatial resolution, gray density range, and contrast, as well as a good pixel/noise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the popularity of the sCAIS increases, the responsible introduction of it's broad application requires a knowledge of common variables and decision‐making points during treatment planning and execution. Errors during data acquisition, data transfer, data processing, treatment planning, guide design and production, as well as surgical execution might all contribute to increased deviations from the virtually planned implant position . The variables encountered during the treatment‐planning step by itself are numerous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%