2018
DOI: 10.1111/aas.13131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity score and the Nottingham risk score in hip fracture patients in Sweden — A prospective observational study

Abstract: BackgroundLittle is known about accuracy of common risk prediction scores in elderly patients suffering from hip fractures. The objective of this study was to investigate accuracy of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) score, Portsmouth‐POSSUM (P‐POSSUM) score and the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) for prediction of mortality and morbidity in this patient group.MethodsThis was a prospective single centre observational study on 997 patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have therefore further examined the ability of NHFS to predict a number of other outcome measures commonly experienced by patients admitted with a hip fracture. We observed that NHFS was associated with in-patient mortality with a predictive value (AUC) of 67.4%, which is modest but similar to figures reported from previous studies for predicting 30-day mortality (AUC range 67-72%) [10,19,20]. The ability of NHFS to predict other measures were also significant but weaker, especially for failure to mobilise within 1 day of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We have therefore further examined the ability of NHFS to predict a number of other outcome measures commonly experienced by patients admitted with a hip fracture. We observed that NHFS was associated with in-patient mortality with a predictive value (AUC) of 67.4%, which is modest but similar to figures reported from previous studies for predicting 30-day mortality (AUC range 67-72%) [10,19,20]. The ability of NHFS to predict other measures were also significant but weaker, especially for failure to mobilise within 1 day of surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Accordingly, hip fracture mortality risk prediction scores do not include fracture type beyond the broad categorisation we have used. 36,37 Our analysis studied 30-day mortality. We did not have data on cause of death which meant that we could not attempt to determine which deaths may have been associated with, or attributable to, the choice of surgical intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are many studies of the prediction on short- or long-term mortality in elderly patients with hip fracture, and the early warning system/indicator on perioperative MODSE has rarely been reported. 4–7 In addition, the conceptualization of “adverse events” or “complications” in the aforementioned study was difficult to define and standardize. As a classical marker of myocardial injury, hs-TnT has been widely used in the diagnosis, stratification and prognostic evaluation of ACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as predictors for postoperative adverse events. 4–7 hs-TnT, as a marker of myocardial injury, has been widely used in the diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of acute coronary syndrome(ACS) and has been confirmed to be associated with the prognosis of many non-coronary diseases such as sepsis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and acute ischemic stroke. 8–12 However, there are little studies on the effect of hs-TnT on the short-term prognosis of elderly patients with hip fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%