Accuracy of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System for predicting successful induction of labour

Bishry, Gaser Mohamed El; Allam, Ihab Serag; Rasheedy, Radwa; Mahmoud, Abdelrahman F

doi:10.1080/01443615.2019.1578735

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…6,15 Alalfy et al, Shreya et al and Mohamed El Bishry et al concluded in their studies that sonographic evaluation of the cervix was better than Bishop's score in predicting outcome of the induction. 7,10,18 On the other hand, Khandelwal et al and Chandra et al concluded that Bishop's score was superior to the sonographic parameters. 19,20 The differences may be due to the fact that all the above mentioned studies included women with post dated pregnancy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…6 TVS measurements are quantitative and easy to reproduce, with minimal discomfort to the patient. 7 It also allows a better evaluation of cervical length, since the supra-vaginal part of cervix is difficult to measure digitally. 8 It also provides access to internal os, which cannot be reached in a closed cervix and where the effacement begins.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Bishop’s score with transvaginal sonographic cervical assessment to predict success of induction of labor

Srivastava,

Coumary A

2024

IJOGR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Induction of labor for medical or obstetric indications is a common practice in modern obstetrics. Evaluation of the cervix by Bishop’s score is universally used to predict the success of induction of labor. But it is a subjective method and many studies have shown that it is not a good indicator of success of induction. To compare Bishop’s scoring system and trans-vaginal sonographic assessment of cervix in predicting the successful outcome of induction of labor.This was an observational study conducted in a tertiary care center. 120 patients who met the selection criteria were included. Prior to the induction of labor the Bishop’s score and the sonographic scoring was assigned. Successful induction was defined as the patient entering the active phase of labor. 84% of participating women entered the active phase of labor. While 72.6% women had a normal vaginal delivery, 67.8% women delivered vaginally within 24 hours of induction. The TVS score (MGPICSS) of ≥2 predicted the successful induction with a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 39.3% and AUC 0.74. In comparison, the Bishop score of ≥4 had a specificity of 75% and sensitivity of 44% and AUC 0.56. The prediction of delivery within 24 hours at the MGPICSS of ≥2 had a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 42.9% and AUC 0.76. For the same, the Bishop’s score of ≥4 had specificity of 83.3% and sensitivity of 45.5% and AUC 0.71. TVS assessment of cervix is a better predictor of successful labor induction in comparison to Bishop’s score.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Bishop’s score with transvaginal sonographic cervical assessment to predict success of induction of labor

Srivastava,

Coumary A

2024

IJOGR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The pre-induction ‘favorability’ of the cervix is assessed by the Bishop score, which is a standard method for the prediction of the duration and outcome of induced labor [ 8 ]. The Bishop Scoring system was first described by Bishop in 1964 and is based on assessing multiple items (the position, consistency, effacement, and dilatation of the cervix, and the fetal station) [ 9 ]. A score below six is indicative of a reduced success [ 3 ] of vaginal birth [ 10 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Misoprostol (prostaglandin E1), which is widely used for induction of labor, is associated with maternal and fetal complications such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, hyperthermia and fetal tachysystole [ [12] , [13] , [14] ]. Hence, given the maternal and neonatal adverse effects associated with pharmaceutical induction methods, there has always been a concern for midwives and obstetricians in achieving effective low-risk interventions [ 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of evening primrose oil on cervical ripening and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Sholeh¹,

Abedi²,

Jahanfar³

et al. 2023

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nomogram based on the final antepartum ultrasound features before delivery for predicting failed spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAccurate identification of nulliparous women with failed spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) is crucial to minimize the hazards associated with obstetrical intervention (OI). While abnormal labor progression can be identified with intrapartum ultrasonography, labor-related complications may be unavoidable due to the limited time window left to the obstetrician. Antepartum ultrasound enables sufficient obstetric planning. However, there is typically a longer gap between ultrasound assessment and delivery that often lowers the prediction accuracy compared to intrapartum ultrasonography.ObjectiveIn this study, antepartum ultrasound assessment was included to each fetal ultrasound examination after 36 weeks of gestation until the onset of labor. We aim to establish a nomogram to predict the likelihood of failed SVD in nulliparous women using the last antepartum ultrasound findings before labor beginning.MethodsOf the 2,143 nulliparous women recruited, 1,373 were included in a training cohort and 770 in a validation cohort, based on their delivery date. Maternal and perinatal characteristics, as well as perinatal ultrasound parameters were collected. In the training cohort, the screened correlates of SVD failure were used to develop a nomogram for determining whether a nulliparous woman would experience SVD failure. This model was validated in both training and validation cohorts.ResultsSVD failure affected 217 nulliparous women (10.13%). In the training cohort, SVD failure was independently associated with BMI [odds ratio (OR) = 1.636], FHC (OR = 1.194), CL (OR = 1.398), and PCA (OR = 0.824) (all P < 0.05). They constituted a nomogram to estimate the individual risk of SVD failure. The model obtained clinical net benefits in both the training and validation cohorts and was validated to present strong discrimination and calibration.ConclusionThe developed nomogram based on the last antepartum ultrasound findings may be helpful in avoiding OI and its related complications by assessing the likelihood of a failed SVD in nulliparous women.

show abstract

Accuracy of the Manipal Cervical Scoring System for predicting successful induction of labour

Cited by 5 publications

References 18 publications

Comparison of Bishop’s score with transvaginal sonographic cervical assessment to predict success of induction of labor

Comparison of Bishop’s score with transvaginal sonographic cervical assessment to predict success of induction of labor

The effect of evening primrose oil on cervical ripening and birth outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nomogram based on the final antepartum ultrasound features before delivery for predicting failed spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About