2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the FAMACHA system for on-farm use by sheep and goat producers in the southeastern United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
73
5
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
73
5
12
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively strong relationship between FAMACHA scores and PCV has commonly been reported in sheep and goats (Kaplan et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2007;Sotomaior et al, 2012). However, in contrast with results from the current study, associations between FAMACHA scores and FEC were often (Kaplan et al, 2004), though not always (Burke et al, 2007), weaker than those between FAMACHA scores and PCV.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A relatively strong relationship between FAMACHA scores and PCV has commonly been reported in sheep and goats (Kaplan et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2007;Sotomaior et al, 2012). However, in contrast with results from the current study, associations between FAMACHA scores and FEC were often (Kaplan et al, 2004), though not always (Burke et al, 2007), weaker than those between FAMACHA scores and PCV.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns of association among FAMACHA scores, FEC, PCV and BW in our study were similar to those reported by Burke et al (2007). A relatively strong relationship between FAMACHA scores and PCV has commonly been reported in sheep and goats (Kaplan et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2007;Sotomaior et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possible variations among breeds (Moors and Gauly, 2009), animal categories and ages (Mahieu et al, 2007), evaluators (Burke et al, 2007), management systems (Reynecke et al, 2011b), environments and facilities must be investigated to determine the real limitations of this method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a significant positive correlation between FAMACHA and FEC has been reported by different workers (Kaplan et al, 2004;Burke et al, 2007), however, when using this system to choose resilient lambs/sires, farmers should have awareness that susceptible lambs may be more vulnerable to GINs due to more pasture infectivity. By careful monitoring of farms, producers can apply the FAMACHA system to recognize not only resilient but also resistant lambs/sires (Burke and Miller, 2008).…”
Section: Tissue Eosinophilsmentioning
confidence: 91%