Accuracy of the EasyTouch blood glucose self-monitoring system: a study of 516 cases

Dai, Ken Shwo; Tai, Der Yan; Ho, P. Michael; Chen, Chien Chih; Peng, Wen Chung; Chen, Shih Te; Hsu, Chang-Hong; Liu, Yu Ping; Hsieh, Hsiu Ching Laura; Yang, Chin Chang; Tsai, Ming Chuan; Mao, Simon J.T.

doi:10.1016/j.cccn.2004.06.010

Cited by 31 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…reproducibility of graphene/AuNPs/GOD/chitosan film-modified electrode (RSD = 4.7%) has similar results compared to some commercially marketed glucose sensors (RSD = 3-6%) (Chen et al, 1998;Dai et al, 2004;Rivers et al, 2006). The linearity and sensitivity (0.55 A mM −1 ) of the proposed biosensor appear to be enough for glucose measurements in blood samples.…”

Section: Detection Of Glucose At Graphene/aunps/god/chitosan-modifiedsupporting

confidence: 79%

Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing

Shan

Yang

Han

et al. 2010

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

741

312

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Detection Of Glucose At Graphene/aunps/god/chitosan-modifiedsupporting

confidence: 79%

Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing

Shan

Yang

Han

et al. 2010

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

741

312

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Error grid analysis is an efficient method that describes the accuracy over the entire range of blood glucose values and evaluates the clinical significance of the accuracy of a particular system. This analysis has been successfully applied in some studies [37,38]. In this analysis, the test-reference (or GA-GF in The present study compared blood glucose measurements using samples taken from the forearm, samples obtained using standard finger skin puncture, and venous serum.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Blood Glucose Measurements Using Samples Obtained from the Forearm, Finger Skin Puncture, and Venous Serum

Park

Joo

et al. 2010

Ann Lab Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Although the use of plasma glucose level corrections seems to improve test-retest variability in a singlecenter setting (6,7), such is not the case in a multicenter setting (33). Standards for the accuracy and precision of plasma glucose measurements therefore should be high (34).…”

Section: Standardization For 18 F-fdg Pet/ct-based Response Assessmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Need for Standardization of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments

Boellaard¹

2011

J Nucl Med

138

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many factors affect standardized uptake values (SUVs) in 18 F-FDG PET/CT. The use of the SUV from a single PET scan in multicenter studies requires the standardization of 18 F-FDG PET/CT procedures. In the context of treatment response assessments (repeated PET scans), many factors may seem to have minor effects on percentage changes in SUVs, provided that imaging procedures are executed in a consistent manner for each subject. However, the use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in a nonstandardized manner will result in unknown biases and reproducibilities of SUVs and SUV-based response measures. This article provides an overview of the need for standardization in relation to the specific use of SUVs and SUV changes in studies of treatment response assessments. Vi sual inspection of 18 F-FDG PET whole-body studies is important for diagnosis and staging (1). However, quantitative PET is increasingly being recognized as an important tool for prognosis and response monitoring (2-5). For the quantification of 18 F-FDG PET studies, various methods, which differ with regard to the complexity of data collection and (mathematic) analysis, have been described; these include tumor-to-background ratios, standardized uptake values (SUVs), and full kinetic analysis (6,7).Semiquantitative analysis by means of SUVs is clinically feasible because an SUV is available in every clinically obtained whole-body scan. It is a simple index for glucose metabolism and can be obtained with good reliability, provided that 18 F-FDG PET/CT studies (including proper calibration procedures) are acquired in a standardized manner. A recent review of existing guidelines and factors affecting SUV results (8) demonstrated how to obtain accurate and reproducible SUV results in single-center and multicenter settings.

show abstract

Accuracy of the EasyTouch blood glucose self-monitoring system: a study of 516 cases

Cited by 31 publications

References 20 publications

Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing

Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing

Comparison of Blood Glucose Measurements Using Samples Obtained from the Forearm, Finger Skin Puncture, and Venous Serum

Need for Standardization of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Accuracy of the EasyTouch blood glucose self-monitoring system: a study of 516 cases

Cited by 31 publications

References 20 publications

Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing

Graphene/AuNPs/chitosan nanocomposites film for glucose biosensing

Comparison of Blood Glucose Measurements Using Samples Obtained from the Forearm, Finger Skin Puncture, and Venous Serum

Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Need for Standardization of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments