2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the combined method (auscultation and pH measurement) and ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement: a study protocol for a prospective study

Abstract: IntroductionPatients using a nasogastric tube (NGT) are vulnerable to adverse events, therefore proper assessment of these patients, verification of the correct tube placement and constant monitoring by the nursing staff are strategies that can reduce adverse events and risks associated with the care. The aim of this study will be to assess the accuracy of the combined method (auscultation and pH measurement) and ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement compared with the X-ray method. A furth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the serious complications of misinterpreting a wrong placement as a correct placement, this study clearly showed that it is difficult to determine the position of the gastric tube by ultrasonography alone. Regarding need for further research in this area, there is a lack of data in creating a comprehensive framework, considering the linkage of testing, interventions, and outcomes, 10 to determine whether ultrasound test combined with other tests 11 reduces complications and accidents caused by an incorrect tube placement. Moreover, the research excluded pregnant, pediatric, and tracheotomized patients, as well as those with anatomical abnormalities, caustic substance ingestion, neck surgery, and head or nose fractures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the serious complications of misinterpreting a wrong placement as a correct placement, this study clearly showed that it is difficult to determine the position of the gastric tube by ultrasonography alone. Regarding need for further research in this area, there is a lack of data in creating a comprehensive framework, considering the linkage of testing, interventions, and outcomes, 10 to determine whether ultrasound test combined with other tests 11 reduces complications and accidents caused by an incorrect tube placement. Moreover, the research excluded pregnant, pediatric, and tracheotomized patients, as well as those with anatomical abnormalities, caustic substance ingestion, neck surgery, and head or nose fractures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esse aspecto também destaca o caráter inédito deste estudo e a importância dessa análise, considerando a crise econômica que o Brasil vive. Os resultados dessa análise permitirão às instituições de saúde brasileiras escolher métodos mais seguros para os pacientes em uso de SNG e SNE, com custo mais acessível(RIGOBELLO et al, 2020).Diante dos métodos para confirmação do posicionamento da SNG e SNE encontrados na revisão da literatura, neste estudo optou-se por avaliar apenas o método da ausculta epigástrica, que ainda é empregado com frequência na prática clínica no Brasil, o método da medição do pH do aspirado gástrico, em combinação com a ausculta epigástrica, e a ultrassonografia, por se tratar de um método com potencial para reduzir os impactos negativos de sondas mal posicionadas.Logo, o presente estudo foi delineado para responder às seguintes perguntas: a) qual a acurácia dos métodos (ausculta epigástrica, medição do pH do resíduo aspirado e ultrassonografia) utilizados por enfermeiros na confirmação do posicionamento de sondas nasoenterais inseridas às cegas à beira leito, em pacientes adultos hospitalizados, em comparação com a radiografia? b) qual a concordância entre tais métodos e a radiografia, que é considerada padrão-ouro na confirmação do posicionamento de sonda nasoenteral?…”
unclassified