Accuracy of the automated assessment of left ventricular function with gated perfusion SPECT in the presence of perfusion defects and left ventricular dysfunction: Correlation with equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography
Abstract:Automated gated SPECT provides an accurate assessment of ejection fraction and regional function, even in the presence of an earlier myocardial infarction with large perfusion defects and significant left ventricular dysfunction.
“…Several groups have compared the quantitative results from the QGS software with similar results from other modalities. Generally in mixed datasets, the concordance with regard to the LVEF is good for contrast ventriculography and ultrasound techniques [6][7][8][9]. Similarly, the concordance with regard to wall thickening is quite good [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies report on mean count activity. Chua et al [7] presented a mean count activity of 19.9% ± 10.5 % of maximal myocardial count activity. Hashimoto et al [20] reported that myocardium with a per cent peak count of 40% or less has very low probability of myocardial viability.…”
Section: Prototypesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In which quantitative assessment of end-diastolic and end-systolic perfusion, wall motion and wall thickening using the 20-segment bull's eye representation of the QGS model [ figure 2], as well as estimates for end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) ventricular volume and derived stroke volume and LVEF is incorporated. The underlying algorithms have been reviewed in literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]17]. The software algorithm implementation is the same in the different camera systems.…”
Section: Gated Spect Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an earlier analysis [7,20], it was concluded that segmental uptakes below 40% in the QGS 20-segment endsystolic perfusion quantification corresponded best with severe perfusion defects. The extent of the perfusion defect is the summation of all segments with a severe perfusion defect.…”
Section: Criteria For Defect Size (Extent) and Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the validation of the Cedars-Sinai's Quantitative SPECT (QGS) software, several requirements have already been met. The algorithm and its basic validation have already been described [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, one particular issue is still not fully solved: reproducibility of the quantitative assessment of regional functional parameters in the presence of severe major defects or artifacts.…”
Objectives: To evaluate the reproducibility and operator dependence for the quantitative regional left ventricular functional parameters (LVFP) assessed by Cedars-Sinai's Quantitative automated gated SPECT (QGS) software. Methods: The QGS algorithm was reviewed in detail and potential operator dependencies were defined. Series of prototypes were selected, consisting of a) normal perfusion, b) perfusion defects in all perfusion regions, c) perfusion studies of patients with angiographic confirmed normal coronary arteries, proximal ( >70% stenoses) single and multiple vessel disease, and d) spurious activity in close proximity. While defining and re-orienting the volume containing the left ventricle, the operator adjusted 8 variables/ degrees of freedom (DF). The software was used without further operator interventions. Results were expressed as a coefficient of variation (COV). Separate COV were calculated per distinct DF. A segment was considered not robust when the COV did exceed 20% in a single DF, 15% in at least 2 DF, or 10% in at least 3 DF. Results: Regional left ventricular EF and volumes showed excellent reproducibility. Normal perfusion and the vessel disease prototypes showed an excellent COV (for all re-orientation steps [33/prototype]) mostly below 5% for LVFP. However, regional wall motion and thickening became less reliable in the presence of large perfusion defects or artifacts. Conclusions: Quantitative estimates for regional left ventricular functional data show excellent reproducibility using automated gated SPECT. However, there may be substantial operator dependency in the presence of large defects or spurious activity in close proximity.
“…Several groups have compared the quantitative results from the QGS software with similar results from other modalities. Generally in mixed datasets, the concordance with regard to the LVEF is good for contrast ventriculography and ultrasound techniques [6][7][8][9]. Similarly, the concordance with regard to wall thickening is quite good [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies report on mean count activity. Chua et al [7] presented a mean count activity of 19.9% ± 10.5 % of maximal myocardial count activity. Hashimoto et al [20] reported that myocardium with a per cent peak count of 40% or less has very low probability of myocardial viability.…”
Section: Prototypesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In which quantitative assessment of end-diastolic and end-systolic perfusion, wall motion and wall thickening using the 20-segment bull's eye representation of the QGS model [ figure 2], as well as estimates for end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) ventricular volume and derived stroke volume and LVEF is incorporated. The underlying algorithms have been reviewed in literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]17]. The software algorithm implementation is the same in the different camera systems.…”
Section: Gated Spect Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on an earlier analysis [7,20], it was concluded that segmental uptakes below 40% in the QGS 20-segment endsystolic perfusion quantification corresponded best with severe perfusion defects. The extent of the perfusion defect is the summation of all segments with a severe perfusion defect.…”
Section: Criteria For Defect Size (Extent) and Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the validation of the Cedars-Sinai's Quantitative SPECT (QGS) software, several requirements have already been met. The algorithm and its basic validation have already been described [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, one particular issue is still not fully solved: reproducibility of the quantitative assessment of regional functional parameters in the presence of severe major defects or artifacts.…”
Objectives: To evaluate the reproducibility and operator dependence for the quantitative regional left ventricular functional parameters (LVFP) assessed by Cedars-Sinai's Quantitative automated gated SPECT (QGS) software. Methods: The QGS algorithm was reviewed in detail and potential operator dependencies were defined. Series of prototypes were selected, consisting of a) normal perfusion, b) perfusion defects in all perfusion regions, c) perfusion studies of patients with angiographic confirmed normal coronary arteries, proximal ( >70% stenoses) single and multiple vessel disease, and d) spurious activity in close proximity. While defining and re-orienting the volume containing the left ventricle, the operator adjusted 8 variables/ degrees of freedom (DF). The software was used without further operator interventions. Results were expressed as a coefficient of variation (COV). Separate COV were calculated per distinct DF. A segment was considered not robust when the COV did exceed 20% in a single DF, 15% in at least 2 DF, or 10% in at least 3 DF. Results: Regional left ventricular EF and volumes showed excellent reproducibility. Normal perfusion and the vessel disease prototypes showed an excellent COV (for all re-orientation steps [33/prototype]) mostly below 5% for LVFP. However, regional wall motion and thickening became less reliable in the presence of large perfusion defects or artifacts. Conclusions: Quantitative estimates for regional left ventricular functional data show excellent reproducibility using automated gated SPECT. However, there may be substantial operator dependency in the presence of large defects or spurious activity in close proximity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.