1987
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90403-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of temporomandibular joint space measurements using corrected hypocycloidal tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional tomography can be used to assess the bony components of the TMJ [37], generally in lateral images, and can also be combined with frontal images. Compared with transcranial radiography, conventional tomography is more efficient for visualizing anatomic structures and produces superior images for evaluating the proportions of the articular biologic spaces as well as for visualizing structural alterations and detecting bone lesions [38][39][40]. Disadvantages of tomography over transcranial radiography include their higher cost and higher radiation exposure [6,41].…”
Section: Conventional Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional tomography can be used to assess the bony components of the TMJ [37], generally in lateral images, and can also be combined with frontal images. Compared with transcranial radiography, conventional tomography is more efficient for visualizing anatomic structures and produces superior images for evaluating the proportions of the articular biologic spaces as well as for visualizing structural alterations and detecting bone lesions [38][39][40]. Disadvantages of tomography over transcranial radiography include their higher cost and higher radiation exposure [6,41].…”
Section: Conventional Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure goes quickly with an experienced operator, but in some cases it can take more time and can expose the patient to significant doses of radiation depending on the duration and the number of tomograms needed [6]. The main disadvantages are discomfort, risk of lesions, allergic and infectious reaction, the high level of exposure to radiation, and the high level of skill required to perform [38,51,70,93]. It is not possible to establish a precise diagnosis of medial or lateral disk displacement using arthrography; rather, it is necessary to consider other diagnostic methods when these types of disk displacement are suspected [89] (Table 1).…”
Section: Arthrographymentioning
confidence: 99%