2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of surgical positioning of orthodontic miniscrews with a computer-aided design and manufacturing template

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
52
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It allows 3D registration of pre- and post-treatment data through identification of specific structures in the cranial base. Therefore, the changes of the upper airway before and after mandibular advancement can be precisely evaluated [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows 3D registration of pre- and post-treatment data through identification of specific structures in the cranial base. Therefore, the changes of the upper airway before and after mandibular advancement can be precisely evaluated [15], [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) registration might be an acceptable imaging technique supplying quantitative assessment of the upper airway changes in clinics, 15,16 and this method might permit an accurate topographical calculation of the upper airway displacements with subvoxel accuracy after identification of the cranial base structures. 17,18 In addition, compared with magnetic resonance imaging, MSCT can offer an alternative to reduce the time required to reduce the breathing effects on airway volume. Therefore, this retrospective, analytical study was designed to evaluate the upper airway morphology changes occurring after large incisor retraction in patients with adult bimaxillary malocclusion by retrospective 3D registration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) cannot quantify the dentoalveolar changes by pre-and post-treatment 3D registration, due to lack of stable references with 3D craniofacial model (Cevidanes et al, 2010). CT scanning might be an acceptable imaging technique supplying a quantitative assessment of upper alveolar bone by CT registration in clinics (Nelson and Michael, 1998), and might permit an accurate topographical calculation of alveolar bone displacements (Liu et al, 2010). Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate maxillary alveolar bone morphology after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult bimaxillary malocclusion by retrospective 3D registration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%