2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)74090-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of references in five leading medical journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall error rate is one of the lowest reported, and is similar to a study published in a general medicine journal where the authors evaluated five leading journals, finding a mean value of 26.5% and a range of 4.1–40.3% 4. Our rate is significantly different from the highest rate reported—60.7% in three gynaecological/obstetrics journals 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The overall error rate is one of the lowest reported, and is similar to a study published in a general medicine journal where the authors evaluated five leading journals, finding a mean value of 26.5% and a range of 4.1–40.3% 4. Our rate is significantly different from the highest rate reported—60.7% in three gynaecological/obstetrics journals 1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These studies have analyzed references from different medical specialties, such as Anatomy, [3] Public Health, [2] Ophthalmology, [4] Radiology, [5] General Medicine, [6] Emergency Medicine, [7] Surgery [8] and Dermatology, [9,10] among others. There is no reason to believe that reference citations are likely to contain more errors in one medical specialty than others.…”
Section: Discussion Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the available evidence suggests that a disproportionate number of errors occur in reference sections even in some of the most prestigious biomedical journals (e.g., Siebers and Holt, 2000). Moreover, with the advent of online-only journals and digital stand-alone documents, the temporary nature of some of these works is an emerging problem.…”
Section: Carelessness In Citing Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%