Accuracy of pre-hospital triage tools for major trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis and net clinical benefit

Abstract

Background We conducted a systematic review to evaluate and compare the accuracy of pre-hospital triage tools for major trauma in the context of the development of the Italian National Institute of Health guidelines on major trauma integrated management. Methods PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched up to November 2019 for studies investigating pre-hospital triage tools. The ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve and net clinical benefit for all selected triage tools were performed. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2. Certainty of the evidence was judged with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results We found 15 observational studies of 13 triage tools for adults and 11 for children. In adults, according to the ROC curve and the net clinical benefit, the most reliable tool was the Northern French Alps Trauma System (TRENAU), adopting injury severity score (ISS) > 15 as reference (sensitivity (Sn), 0.92; specificity (Sp), 0.41; 1 study; sample size, 2572; high certainty of the evidence). When mortality as reference was considered, the pre-hospital triage tool with the best net clinical benefit trajectory was the New Trauma Score (NTS) < 18 (Sn, 0.82; Sp, 0.86; 1 study; sample size, 1001; moderate certainty of the evidence). In children, high variability among all triage tools for sensitivity and specificity was found. Conclusion Sensitivity and specificity varied across all available pre-hospital trauma triage tools. TRENAU and NTS are the best accurate triage tools for adults, whereas in the pediatric area a large variability prevents any firm conclusion.

A prospective study comparing two methods of pre-hospital triage for trauma

“…Even though criteria based solely on trauma dynamic and patient's characteristics seem to be the most relevant cause of overtriage [ 15 , 16 ], it is important not to underestimate the condition of grade C patients since age and MOI showed to correlate with injury severity [ 6 , 17 , 18 ]. Some studies even suggested the need for specialized geriatric trauma teams and specific triage criteria for elderly patients and children [ 19 – 21 ].…”

“…A more recent and comprehensive study regarding the TRENAU classification is a systematic review with meta-analysis conducted by Gianola et al[ 19 ] . which compares the TRENAU score with other triage tools (e.g.…”

Defining Adaptation of Space Medicine within Military Medicine

“…To fulfill such a demand, the training of Military Medicine clinicians has been observed to be the most efficient and optimal solution as they are already trained in first aid, TCCC, and other emergency medicine practices. The success of prehospital care relies on accurate triage where less accurate triage can unnecessarily lower treatment passed the acceptable standard of care or deviate from the correct diagnoses [18]. The utilization of Military Medicine clinicians is essential as they are already trained in triage practices and are more likely to accurately triage prehospital casualties as Military Medicine has extensive experience in triage out of other medical specialties.…”

Risk factors and mortality associated with undertriage after major trauma in a physician-led prehospital system: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

“…In France, prehospital EMS is physician-led, from call reception to on-scene intervention, where care is provided by a mobile medical team (MMT). This model of EMS was shown to be an effective way to optimize prehospital triage 7,8 and this could partly be due to the use of a Vittel criteria-based grading system 7,9 . However, the factors associated with undertriage and their impact on patient-centered outcomes have yet to be investigated in this physician-led prehospital system.…”