2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of placement of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
73
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Early promising results have been reported in cadaveric and clinical studies. 12,28,51,53 Whereas the technology can improve both humeral and glenoid implant alignment in routine cases, it is especially useful in situations in which normal anatomy is distorted, such as with fractures, glenoid erosion, dysplasia, and revisions. Taken yet a step further, patient-specific instrumentation is now available for shoulder arthroplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early promising results have been reported in cadaveric and clinical studies. 12,28,51,53 Whereas the technology can improve both humeral and glenoid implant alignment in routine cases, it is especially useful in situations in which normal anatomy is distorted, such as with fractures, glenoid erosion, dysplasia, and revisions. Taken yet a step further, patient-specific instrumentation is now available for shoulder arthroplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No prospective clinical study has so far been reported on the use of CT navigation in RSA but the technique on cadavers has yielded satisfactory results. Verborgt and colleagues11 in a cadaveric study comparing CT navigation and conventional technique concluded that CT navigation significantly improves glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Of the 14 cases in each group, there was perforation of the superior screw in four patients and the inferior screw in one patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five works have been Verborgt et al [30] showed a higher accuracy for achieving a central position of the glenoid in the axial plane and a 10°t ilt in the frontal plane by using a navigation system in a cadaver study. Similar improvements by employing computer navigation for better accuracy of reaming of the glenoid and glenoid component positioning showed three other cadaver studies [5,20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%