2010
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of patient-reported height loss and risk factors for height loss among postmenopausal women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only ASM/ht 2 showed any association with physical function (TUG, Table 3) and this association was weak, in an unexpected positive direction and might be explained by differences in body height (Table 4). Elderly women were shorter than younger women, possibly as a result of vertebral compression following reduced bone mineral density 37. Comparisons between women of high versus poor physical function indicated clear differences in ankle, knee, and especially hip strength but none in body composition (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only ASM/ht 2 showed any association with physical function (TUG, Table 3) and this association was weak, in an unexpected positive direction and might be explained by differences in body height (Table 4). Elderly women were shorter than younger women, possibly as a result of vertebral compression following reduced bone mineral density 37. Comparisons between women of high versus poor physical function indicated clear differences in ankle, knee, and especially hip strength but none in body composition (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study from a national representative sample of individuals aged over 50 years in England estimated a loss of measured height of 2-4 cm in men and women over the life course (Fernihough and McGovern, 2014). Another study among 8,610 Canadian women revealed mean loss of height of 4.5 cm compared to patients' tallest recalled height at mean age of 71 years (Briot et al, 2010). Differences in height loss could be related to the measurement method and differences in the cohorts related to ethnicity and lifestyle, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholds useful in clinical practice to detect prevalent vertebral fracture range from 3 cm to 6 cm, with the risk of prevalent fracture increasing with the magnitude of the height loss (Krege et al, 2006;Vokes et al, 2006;Gunnes et al, 1996). A mean loss of height of 4.5 cm since early adulthood was observed in the study by Briot et al (2010) in a large population of postmenopausal women in primary care practices. They observed that the risk of an existing vertebral fracture was significantly higher among patients with a height loss of at least 4 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However it varies greatly among individuals. Causes of height loss include changes in the curvature of the spine, narrowing of the intervetebral discs and vertebral fractures (Briot et al, 2010). Excessive height loss was found to reflect low bone mass, a feature of postmenopausal osteoporosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%