2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com:20060271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of packet loss monitoring over networked CPE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using Markov chains to model the evolution and statistics of the backlog of packets in router buffers is now ubiquitous in network engineering (Bergstrom et al 2002;Vellambi and Fekri 2008;Liu, Sutton, and Collins 2009). Hasib, Schormans, and Timotijevic (2007) developed an analytic solution quantifying the number of probes needed as a function of the level of accuracy required, the characteristics and load of the packet traffic, and the target packet loss probability. This result is similar to that of Lee and Chanson (2002) where a two-state discrete-space Markov chain is used to model a channel in a wireless network.…”
Section: Modeling Packet Communication Network As Markov Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using Markov chains to model the evolution and statistics of the backlog of packets in router buffers is now ubiquitous in network engineering (Bergstrom et al 2002;Vellambi and Fekri 2008;Liu, Sutton, and Collins 2009). Hasib, Schormans, and Timotijevic (2007) developed an analytic solution quantifying the number of probes needed as a function of the level of accuracy required, the characteristics and load of the packet traffic, and the target packet loss probability. This result is similar to that of Lee and Chanson (2002) where a two-state discrete-space Markov chain is used to model a channel in a wireless network.…”
Section: Modeling Packet Communication Network As Markov Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the ACM SIGMETRICS'05, Roughan [17] investigated the inaccuracies caused by correlations between successive probes and derived fundamental limitations. A series of recent papers by Schormans et al, has also explored the potential inaccuracy inherent in packet level measurement, [22], [26], [25], [9], [12], [20], [9]. It has been discovered that even for simple buffering scenarios there are practical load limits beyond which measurement accuracy degrades very rapidly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] queueing analysis was used to show that, for a tail-drop queue, probes would need to be of very similar length to the user packets or else the measured loss probabilities could easily be in error by many orders of magnitude. One of the significant results of the work reported in [9] is that the burstiness of the loss process also has a critical effect, causing any measurement process to require far more samples than would be expected from a naive calculation based only on the target loss probability. In this paper we focus on loss probing as there has already been significantly more research on probing delays (mean delays in particular).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known that networks repeat the cycle of being congested-empty-congested indefinitely [3,4]. In fact, when we carefully look into the experimental results in the previous section we can find that there exist certain patterns in network latency variations.…”
Section: A Network Latency Groupsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Queueing theory is used with a small scale network having the information on individual links involved [4,5]. However, the computation cost grows dramatically as the size of network increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%