The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Noninvasive Fibrosis Scores to Detect Advanced Fibrosis in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes With Biopsy-proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Abstract: Background: Recent guidelines have recommended screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and case finding of advanced disease with fibrosis in patients with type-2 diabetes (T2D). The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of commonly used noninvasive scores to predict the presence of advanced fibrosis (AF) in a large cohort of diabetics in real-life settings. Patients and Methods: Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FIB‐4, NFS, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)‐to‐platelet ratio index (APRI) were chosen as the diagnostic panels to identify participants with advanced fibrosis, as these are well validated, supported by the literature (9,10,27‐29,31,37,38), and most widely used in clinical practice. NFS, FIB‐4, and APRI were calculated as follows:FIB40.277778em=0.277778emAge)(years0.277778em×0.277778emAST)(normalUfalse/normalLfalse/Platelet)(×109/L0.277778em×0.277778emALT0.333333em)(normalUfalse/normalL…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FIB‐4, NFS, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)‐to‐platelet ratio index (APRI) were chosen as the diagnostic panels to identify participants with advanced fibrosis, as these are well validated, supported by the literature (9,10,27‐29,31,37,38), and most widely used in clinical practice. NFS, FIB‐4, and APRI were calculated as follows:FIB40.277778em=0.277778emAge)(years0.277778em×0.277778emAST)(normalUfalse/normalLfalse/Platelet)(×109/L0.277778em×0.277778emALT0.333333em)(normalUfalse/normalL…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McPherson and colleagues also suggested 2.0 of low COI in 65 years or older [ 95 ]. On data of 1008 patients with MAFLD from nine centers across eight countries (The Gut and Obesity in Asia (GOASIA) Workgroup), NITs such as APRI, NFS, and FIB-4 index had a lower specificity in elderly (AUROC 0.62–0.65) [ 97 ]. Female (OR: 3.21; 95% CI 1.37–7.54] and hypertension (OR 3.68; 95%CI 1.11–12.23) were predicting factors for advanced fibrosis in the elderly [ 97 ].…”
Section: Drawbacks Of Fib-4 Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients might be falsely classified into NASH group, which might introduce bias in logistic regression analysis. Nevertheless, several noninvasive models for predicting NASH or advanced liver fibrosis of NAFLD showed lower performance in diabetes patients than in non-diabetes patients [27,28]. Thus, the contribution of bile acid to the NASH development in diabetes patients need to further clarify.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%